IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v335y2025ics0360544225035042.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Dynamic connectedness of decomposed energy-risks shocks and the United States’ S&P 500 indexes

Author

Listed:
  • Dam, Mehmet Metin
  • Altıntaş, Halil
  • Alola, Andrew Adewale

Abstract

This study explores the relationship between decomposed oil shocks (supply, demand, and risk), geopolitical risks, and the market performance of main sectors of the S&P 500, using daily data spanning from January 5, 2015, to June 1, 2023. To examine these dynamics, a range of advanced empirical methodologies are employed, including generalized connectedness, R2 connectedness approaches, net total directional connectedness (NTDC), net pairwise directional connectedness (NPDC), wavelet quantile correlation (WQC), cross-quantileogram (CRQ), and nonparametric causality-in-quantile (NPCQ). The analysis specifically investigates the effects of oil shocks and geopolitical risks on the sector performances of energy (ENR), technology (TEC), communications (COM), financial (FIN), healthcare (HEL), materials (MAT), and real estate (RAS) sectors of the S&P 500. The sectors such as energy, technology, and communication are found to be more sensitive to global economic and trade developments, with immediate effects being more pronounced compared to delayed ones. During events such as the COVID-19 pandemic, the global economic slowdown in 2023, and the oil price decline in 2015–2016, contemporaneous effects were dominant, while uncertainties such as trade wars and interest rate hikes became more prominent post-2018, resulting in delayed impacts. Geopolitical risks generally exhibited limited effects, whereas demand and risk shocks, particularly during crisis periods like the pandemic, had stronger contemporaneous effects. Sectoral sensitivity over time indicated significant fluctuations between net transmitter and net receiver roles in response to supply and demand shocks. The energy sector played both roles, highlighting substantial variability in sectoral responses. Demand shocks were associated with strong negative correlations in the healthcare sector, while supply and risk shocks showed more complex and variable impacts. Geopolitical risks generated varying positive and negative correlations across different sectors over time, underscoring the complex nature of their influence. These findings suggest that the effects of external shocks on sectors are contingent on factors such as time, magnitude, and sector type.

Suggested Citation

  • Dam, Mehmet Metin & Altıntaş, Halil & Alola, Andrew Adewale, 2025. "Dynamic connectedness of decomposed energy-risks shocks and the United States’ S&P 500 indexes," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 335(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:335:y:2025:i:c:s0360544225035042
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2025.137862
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544225035042
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2025.137862?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • C22 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Single Equation Models; Single Variables - - - Time-Series Models; Dynamic Quantile Regressions; Dynamic Treatment Effect Models; Diffusion Processes
    • C58 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric Modeling - - - Financial Econometrics
    • D53 - Microeconomics - - General Equilibrium and Disequilibrium - - - Financial Markets
    • N22 - Economic History - - Financial Markets and Institutions - - - U.S.; Canada: 1913-

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:335:y:2025:i:c:s0360544225035042. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.