Author
Listed:
- Li, Chen
- Liu, Shuai
- Wang, Yurui
- Li, Shuang
- Shi, Yixiang
- Cai, Ningsheng
- Zhu, Xuancan
Abstract
The development of the traditional coal-to-methanol process has been constrained due to its high carbon emissions and low energy efficiency. In this paper, the authors proposed an entire elevating temperature process in green hydrogen production for coal to methanol process (ETGH-CTM), where the elevated temperature alkaline water electrolysis and the elevated temperature pressure swing adsorption technology were integrated to replace the water gas shift unit and the Rectisol process. The traditional coal-to-methanol (T-CTM) and green hydrogen coupled with coal-to-methanol (GH-CTM) processes were also built and validated. Each process is compared and analyzed for two gasification methods. The carbon utilization efficiency, energy utilization efficiency and economic analysis are compared to explore the advantages of the elevated temperature process. The results show that compared to T-CTM, the energy utilization efficiency increases from 49.38 %∼51.73 % to 57.47 %∼57.64 % and 58.08 %∼ 58.58 % under GH-CTM and ETGH-CTM, respectively. The carbon utilization efficiency for pulverized coal gasification rises from 44.66 %∼45.73 % to 83.00 %∼89.92 % and 94.21 %∼ 96.10 % under GH-CTM and ETGH-CTM. For economic performance, using Internal Rate of Return as the evaluation metric. Cross-comparison of coal gasification routes reveals that pulverized coal and coal-water slurry configurations yield equivalent IRR values for GH-CTM (4.07 %) and ETGH-CTM (17.48 %) processes at threshold electricity prices of 0.342 CNY/kWh and 0.336 CNY/kWh respectively. Progressive reduction in green electricity pricing beyond these thresholds confers increasingly favorable economics to the ETGH-CTM pathway.
Suggested Citation
Li, Chen & Liu, Shuai & Wang, Yurui & Li, Shuang & Shi, Yixiang & Cai, Ningsheng & Zhu, Xuancan, 2025.
"Entire elevating temperature processes for green hydrogen coupled coal-to-methanol process: simulation and techno-economic evaluation,"
Energy, Elsevier, vol. 335(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:energy:v:335:y:2025:i:c:s0360544225034218
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2025.137779
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:335:y:2025:i:c:s0360544225034218. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.