Author
Listed:
- Huang, Tengfei
- Wang, Tao
- Guo, Qing
- Shu, Pengqi
- Gou, Qiuqin
Abstract
To enhance the application of multi-stage pump as turbine (PAT) for high-pressure energy recovery, a deeper understanding of their performance is essential. This study provides a comparative analysis of the energy loss mechanisms in a multi-stage centrifugal pump operating in both turbine and pump modes. Based on entropy generation theory, the analysis utilizes numerical simulations validated by experimental data. The results demonstrate that in both modes, turbulent entropy generation and wall entropy generation account for over 54 % and 37 % of the total entropy generation, respectively, while viscous entropy generation is less than 1 %. This indicates that the energy loss is primarily attributed to the unsteady flow in the mainstream region and the wall effects in the near-wall region. For both modes, the components with the high energy loss are the impeller, guide vane, and pump cavity. Furthermore, a significant difference in the dominant energy loss mechanisms between the two modes is revealed. In turbine mode, the primary loss stems from the mismatch between the flow angle and the blade angle at the impeller inlet. In contrast, for the pump mode, the dominant losses are caused by flow separation and the jet-wake structure within the flow channels. The front pump cavity is another major contributor to energy loss in both modes, where the resulting leakage generates internal vortices and backflow. This study not only provides insights into the energy loss characteristics of multi-stage centrifugal pumps in both modes but also offers new perspectives for their structural optimization.
Suggested Citation
Huang, Tengfei & Wang, Tao & Guo, Qing & Shu, Pengqi & Gou, Qiuqin, 2025.
"Energy loss analysis of a multi-stage centrifugal pump using in pump mode and turbine mode,"
Energy, Elsevier, vol. 334(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:energy:v:334:y:2025:i:c:s0360544225034267
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2025.137784
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:334:y:2025:i:c:s0360544225034267. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.