Author
Listed:
- Ma, Qixin
- Qiu, Yutong
- Zhang, Quanchang
- Chen, Zheng
Abstract
Environmental analysis methods, such as environmental cost accounting, are widely used in the aeroengine field, playing a crucial role in enhancing energy utilization. Therefore, to extend these benefits to heavy-duty engines and investigate the sustainability and environmental cost of n-butanol/diesel blends with different alcohol energy fractions, this study was carried out on a heavy-duty engine. The following fuels were tested: pure diesel (AEF0), 85 % diesel + 15 % n-butanol (by volume) (AEF12), and 70 % diesel + 30 % n-butanol (by volume) (AEF25). The results showed that the higher the alcohol energy fraction, the poorer the fuel economy. However, both energy efficiency and exergy efficiency can be improved with the addition of n-butanol. Energy efficiency was consistently higher than exergy efficiency across all operating conditions, reaching maximum values of 43.27 % and 40.04 %, respectively, under identical conditions. Furthermore, the Sustainability index (SI) and Improvement potential (IP) both exhibited a change in trend at 14 bar, with a sharp increase in SI and a decrease in IP. With increasing alcohol energy fraction, these inflection points shifted to lower loads. Soot emissions decreased significantly with increasing alcohol energy fraction, with the highest decrease of 65.2 %. However, NOx emissions of the blend fuels increased significantly at medium and high loads, exceeding 800 ppm under certain conditions. Additionally, the environmental effects of n-butanol were significantly increased under medium and high loads, resulting in an increase in environmental cost from 7.1 % to 34.4 × 10-3 €/kWh at loads around 18 bar. This study provides a reference for evaluating the practical application value of alcohol additives.
Suggested Citation
Ma, Qixin & Qiu, Yutong & Zhang, Quanchang & Chen, Zheng, 2025.
"The practical application value of n-butanol in a heavy-duty engine: Energy-exergy-emission-environmental cost (4E) and sustainability analysis,"
Energy, Elsevier, vol. 334(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:energy:v:334:y:2025:i:c:s0360544225032682
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2025.137626
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:334:y:2025:i:c:s0360544225032682. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.