IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v334y2025ics0360544225032189.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Thermal analysis and configuration optimization of Organic Rankine Cycle for waste heat recovery from a steady state Chinese Fusion Engineering Testing Power Reactor

Author

Listed:
  • Khan, Muhammad Salman
  • Bin, Guo
  • Yuntao, Song
  • Imran, Muhammad

Abstract

A promising steady state magnetic fusion reactor is the Chinese Fusion Engineering Testing Reactor (CFETR). This study presents, for first time, the coupling of an efficient and optimized Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) with CFETR power reactor to recover low grade waste heat, tackling challenges in minimizing the heat loss and enhancing the thermal performance. To address these challenges, advanced simulation and thermodynamic models were developed using EES and lamp based model with MATLAB to achieve high thermal efficiency. A non-ORC system using steam extraction with reheating exhibits a thermal performance of 27.4 %, approximately 1.1 % higher than a conventional Rankine cycle configuration without reheating. In comparison, the proposed ORC system incorporating reheating and preheating stages was evaluated with Toluene and R245fa as working fluids. R245fa achieved superior thermal performance, with a thermal efficiency of 40.1 % and exergy efficiency of 57 %, outperforming both organic and conventional working fluids under the same thermal input of 300 kW and temperature range from 70 °C to 165 °C. The analysis identified R245fa, combined with reheating and preheating ORC configuration, as a promising candidate for CFETR waste heat recovery. The sensitivity studies were conducted on turbine isentropic efficiency, working fluid pressure, and partial load behavior to optimize system parameters such as turbine-generated power, net system power, pump power requirements, and condenser heat extraction. Also, exergy analysis was performed to determine the quality of heat and work done by the ORC. The developed thermodynamic model accuracy was validated through the back work ratio and heat rate trend of decreasing and increasing, thermal and exergy efficiency showed deviation about ±3 %, with the result reported in literature. At optimal conditions, the system generated net power 132.7 kW and rejected 156.2 kW of heat. This study demonstrates the viability of ORC technology, particularly with R245fa, in fusion reactor applications and provides a reference framework for the low grade heat recovery for nuclear power plants. It offers an effective approach to meeting energy demands, reducing heat rejection, and ensuring the safe and long-term operation of CFETR under controllable conditions.

Suggested Citation

  • Khan, Muhammad Salman & Bin, Guo & Yuntao, Song & Imran, Muhammad, 2025. "Thermal analysis and configuration optimization of Organic Rankine Cycle for waste heat recovery from a steady state Chinese Fusion Engineering Testing Power Reactor," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 334(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:334:y:2025:i:c:s0360544225032189
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2025.137576
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544225032189
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2025.137576?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:334:y:2025:i:c:s0360544225032189. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.