Author
Listed:
- Guo, Yuntao
- Yan, Kangli
- Qian, Xinwu
- Li, Xinghua
- Hu, Yuting
- Wang, Ning
Abstract
The battery swapping mode has garnered growing attention for commercial electric vehicles (CEVs) due to its potential to substantially reduce charging downtime and improve fleet utilization over conventional charging. Its effective deployment, however, requires robust and cost-efficient battery swapping station (BSS) planning capable of handling demand uncertainty—driven by factors such as fluctuating fleet sizes, varying battery degradation rates, and unpredictable charging behavior. To address this challenge, this study proposes a mixed-integer linear programming (MILP) model to optimize BSS locations and battery inventory, minimizing total system costs including construction, operation, and detour costs associated with CEVs deviating from regular service routes to access BSSs. Demand uncertainty is captured via a budgeted uncertainty set to ensure computational tractability and robustness. Given the model's complexity, it is reformulated as a deterministic robust optimization problem and solved using a Benders decomposition approach. Numerical experiments, using real-world data from a BSS operator in Shanghai, validate the model's effectiveness in minimizing system cost while ensuring robust deployment decisions. Additionally, Benders decomposition algorithm improves computational efficiency by over 40 % on average compared to a commercial solver, with greater advantages observed as node- and system-level uncertainties increase. This modeling framework offers practical insights for policymakers and industry stakeholders developing scalable, resilient BSS networks to support the growth of CEV adoption.
Suggested Citation
Guo, Yuntao & Yan, Kangli & Qian, Xinwu & Li, Xinghua & Hu, Yuting & Wang, Ning, 2025.
"A robust optimal battery swapping station location model for commercial electric vehicles under demand uncertainty,"
Energy, Elsevier, vol. 333(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:energy:v:333:y:2025:i:c:s0360544225031081
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2025.137466
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:333:y:2025:i:c:s0360544225031081. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.