Author
Abstract
This study aims to demystify the link between Bitcoin pricing and the associated electricity costs, constituting the most significant cost in mining Bitcoin. The article revisits the typical Cost-price (electricity consumption -Bitcoin price) relationship in the context of Bitcoin. The research question is answered using the Nonlinear Autoregressive Distributed Lag (NARDL) Model complemented with Multiple Breakpoints Least Squares Regression (MBLSR). The study analyzes monthly data from various sources from March 2017 to September 2023 and is segregated into four different regimes. The convergence in both techniques provides rigour and robustness to the results. The findings reveal the asymmetric relationship where Bitcoin's energy consumption does not increase significantly with a positive change in Bitcoin Price. This behaviour is counterintuitive given that electricity consumption is expected to increase in a high price period because of more profit margins. The flooding of accumulated Bitcoins by the miners in high price periods may be a contributing reason for no significant increase in the electricity consumption in mining Bitcoins. Conversely, the fall in Bitcoin prices will reduce the energy consumed by the Bitcoin Network conforming to the anticipated pattern. This behaviour is in stark contradiction to the Law of Supply and is well explained by the Bitcoin miners' operational strategy in the Boom and Recession period. Relying on the asymmetric behaviour, investors can revamp their strategy to make profits in the market. In addition, findings suggest policymakers try to limit credit accessibility to miners in the bust to reduce the colossal energy consumption of Bitcoin.
Suggested Citation
Sapra, Nishant, 2025.
"Powering profits, draining the planet: Demystifying the asymmetric impact of Bitcoin price on its electricity consumption,"
Energy, Elsevier, vol. 333(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:energy:v:333:y:2025:i:c:s0360544225030555
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2025.137413
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:333:y:2025:i:c:s0360544225030555. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.