Author
Abstract
The research on small modular reactors (SMRs) is one of the recent primary trends in the nuclear technology fields. Unfortunately, the published research on the fundamental load-following control problem of the SMR is mostly based on explicit models, which are highly restricted by model mismatches, parameter perturbations, and disturbances. To this end, this paper aims to develop a novel model-free near-optimal adaptive sliding mode load-following control (ASMLFC) strategy for the SMR, invoking the state-of-the-art sliding mode control techniques, reinforcement learning (RL), nonlinear extended state observer (NESO), and radial basis function neural network (RBFNN). The dynamic model of the SMR is first transformed into a nonlinear second-order cascade system, where all unavailable system states, nonlinear dynamics, and model uncertainties are aggregated into a fully uncertain lumped function. This function, together with the unmeasured system state, is then estimated by the proposed NESO, utilizing only the available output measurement and control input from the SMR system. After that, the model-free ASMLFC strategy, integrated with the estimates of the unknown lumped function and unmeasured system state provided by the NESO, actor–critic architecture of the RL, and approximation capability of the RBFNN, is developed, such that the near-optimal load-following control quality can be guaranteed, independently of any unpredictable model-related factors. By employing Lyapunov’s direct method, the Routh–Hurwitz criterion, and the Hamilton–Jacobi–Bellman equation, the adaptive update laws for the RL-based optimal value function and control action, along with the RBFNN weight vector, are theoretically derived. Moreover, the uniform ultimate boundedness of both the NESO estimation error dynamic and the SMR load control error under the developed ASMLFC strategy is rigorously proven. In the end, comparative simulation studies further confirm that the developed ASMLFC strategy outperforms the pre-existing optimal proportional–integral–derivative controller, nonlinear dynamic inversion controller, and model-free fuzzy neural network controller.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:333:y:2025:i:c:s0360544225029597. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.