Author
Listed:
- Li, Demin
- Dong, Xiaochen
- Zhao, Chenyu
- Wang, Tianyuan
- Borthwick, Alistair G.L.
- Sharma, Sanjay
- Shi, Hongda
Abstract
This study proposes an efficient optimization framework that integrates an analytical frequency-domain model with the Response Surface Methodology (RSM) to determine the optimal geometric configuration of a floating two-buoy wave energy converter (WEC). Within this framework, RSM is employed to establish a surrogate model that captures the relationship between input geometric parameters and the corresponding energy output through regression analysis. A novel optimization objective is introduced in the form of the capture width ratio divided by the mass ratio, which we call the 'capture width ratio (CWR)-to-mass ratio', aiming to maximize energy capture while simultaneously minimizing structural cost. Two distinct two-buoy configurations are examined: one in which the inner buoy is connected to a submerged body, and another in which the inner buoy is fitted with a damping plate. The effectiveness of each design is evaluated via sensitivity analysis with respect to key geometric parameters. Furthermore, the frequency-dependent adaptability of the optimal geometric parameters is assessed to identify the most optimal inner buoy configuration. Results demonstrate that the proposed RSM-based predictive model offers a computationally efficient and adaptable mathematical framework. The incorporation of cost considerations into the optimization objective enhances the practical feasibility and deployment potential of the two-buoy WEC system in real-world marine environments.
Suggested Citation
Li, Demin & Dong, Xiaochen & Zhao, Chenyu & Wang, Tianyuan & Borthwick, Alistair G.L. & Sharma, Sanjay & Shi, Hongda, 2025.
"Optimization of two configurations of a two-buoy wave energy converter,"
Energy, Elsevier, vol. 332(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:energy:v:332:y:2025:i:c:s0360544225028828
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2025.137240
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:332:y:2025:i:c:s0360544225028828. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.