Author
Listed:
- Xu, Fuqiang
- Wang, Gaosheng
- Li, Linshuo
- Ji, Can
- Zhang, Shenglong
- Wang, Cong
Abstract
The decommissioning of abandoned oil wells incurs high sealing costs and significant maintenance challenges. However, many oilfields have abundant geothermal resources, and repurposing these wells for geothermal energy extraction can lower drilling and sealing expenses while reducing environmental pollution. Given the challenges of wellbore damage and the low-grade geothermal resources typically found in oilfield regions, converting these wells into single-well open geothermal systems simplifies retrofitting and enhances production efficiency. This study introduces a coupled oil-water two-phase thermal-hydrological model for horizontal and vertical single-well open systems to examine the impact of perforation intervals on system performance. The model analyzes operational characteristics of different well types and key influencing factors. Research shows that due to anisotropic permeability and gravitational effects, horizontal well systems experience greater temperature drops and differential pressure (30 °C and 4.4 MPa) compared to vertical systems (2.4 °C and 0.5 MPa). While vertical well systems yield more daily oil production, horizontal systems are more sensitive to variations in operating parameters. Injection temperature significantly impacts production temperature, while injection mass rate affects pressure differences. Additionally, cycle periods play a crucial role in overall system performance. Choosing appropriate perforation locations in abandoned oil wells can enhance system performance. This study serves as a reference for selecting optimal well types and retrofitting strategies when converting abandoned wells into geothermal wells, providing valuable guidance for process design.
Suggested Citation
Xu, Fuqiang & Wang, Gaosheng & Li, Linshuo & Ji, Can & Zhang, Shenglong & Wang, Cong, 2025.
"Evaluation of production performance in open-loop systems for repurposed abandoned oil wells into geothermal wells: A comparative study of various single-well types,"
Energy, Elsevier, vol. 332(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:energy:v:332:y:2025:i:c:s036054422502780x
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2025.137138
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:332:y:2025:i:c:s036054422502780x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.