Author
Listed:
- Sun, Zhuyuan
- He, Ye
- Wu, Hongbin
- Wu, Andrew Y.
Abstract
The irrational layout of electric vehicle charging stations (EVCS) will affect the investment economics of EVCS operators and the charging satisfaction of electric vehicle (EV) users. Based on the above research background, a method of EVCS planning based on a Nash bargaining game is proposed to coordinate the different interests between EVCS operators and EV users. Firstly, by integrating the spatial-temporal state of charge (SOC) characteristics and charging pile preferences of EV users, a charging management strategy is presented to predict their charging demands accurately. Then, the Nash bargaining game theory is introduced to establish a bi-level planning model of EVCS. In the upper level, the preliminary planning of EVCS is carried out with the objective of minimizing the economic costs for EVCS operators and EV users, respectively. In the lower level, aiming to maximize the charging satisfaction of EV users, the service areas of EVCS are divided accordingly. The loads of each station are then returned to the upper level to achieve capacity optimization. A hybrid optimization algorithm using the iterative search method and Dijkstra's algorithm is used to solve the bi-level model. Finally, through comprehensive comparisons of experimental results, it is shown that the proposed method can meet the balance of interests among different stakeholders. More specifically, the total economic cost and EV users' queuing time are reduced by 16.11 % and 57.14 %, respectively.
Suggested Citation
Sun, Zhuyuan & He, Ye & Wu, Hongbin & Wu, Andrew Y., 2025.
"Bi-level planning of electric vehicle charging stations considering charging demand: A Nash bargaining game approach,"
Energy, Elsevier, vol. 332(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:energy:v:332:y:2025:i:c:s0360544225027793
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2025.137137
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:332:y:2025:i:c:s0360544225027793. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.