IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v330y2025ics0360544225025769.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Investigation on strategies for reducing exhaust losses in opposed rotary piston engine and the impact of structure-induced internal EGR on engine performance

Author

Listed:
  • Wang, Yufeng
  • Gao, Jian
  • Gao, Jianbing
  • Wang, Xiaochen
  • Song, Jilong
  • Jiang, Shuo

Abstract

The opposed rotary piston (ORP) engine offers advantages such as compact size, high power-density, and structural simplicity, making it a promising candidate for long-endurance, heavy-load unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) applications. Unlike conventional engines, the ORP engine eliminates intake and exhaust valves, instead controlling the gas exchange process through phase adjustments of the exhaust ports on the cylinder block. Investigating the impact of exhaust port structural parameters on exhaust behavior and the realization of internal exhaust gas recirculation (iEGR) is essential for reducing exhaust losses, mitigating knock tendencies, and improving emission performance. In this study, the structural parameters of the ORP engine's exhaust port were defined, and the exhaust characteristics under various port configurations were analyzed. A strategy for achieving iEGR through adjustments of the exhaust early closing angle (EECA) was proposed, and its effects on intake characteristics, in-cylinder combustion behavior, and overall engine performance were evaluated. Results indicate that an exhaust advance angle (EAA) of 18° yields the highest indicated work, representing a 13.75 % improvement over the baseline configuration. Increasing the exhaust tilt angle (ETA) reduces expansion losses but simultaneously increases exhaust losses, resulting in a net decrease in indicated work, which declines by 2.71 % when the ETA reaches 30°. The EECA influences the residual gas content by altering the exhaust stroke termination timing and shows a positive correlation with the iEGR rate and a negative correlation with charging efficiency (CGE). At an EECA of 50°, the iEGR rate reaches 15.91 %. An EECA range of 10–20° is recommended for optimal fuel economy and combustion stability. Conversely, if emission performance is the primary concern, a range of 20–30° is more appropriate.

Suggested Citation

  • Wang, Yufeng & Gao, Jian & Gao, Jianbing & Wang, Xiaochen & Song, Jilong & Jiang, Shuo, 2025. "Investigation on strategies for reducing exhaust losses in opposed rotary piston engine and the impact of structure-induced internal EGR on engine performance," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 330(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:330:y:2025:i:c:s0360544225025769
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2025.136934
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544225025769
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2025.136934?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:330:y:2025:i:c:s0360544225025769. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.