Author
Listed:
- Middleton, Luke
- Bernagozzi, Marco
- Morgan, Rob
- Milton, Gareth
- Atkins, Andy
- Atkins, Penny
Abstract
This study evaluates a proposed small-scale methane liquefaction system with two compressor configurations: a reciprocating compressor and a liquid piston. While capturing gaseous methane offers environmental benefits and energy potential, its low volumetric energy density challenges its practical and economic viability. The proposed configuration with a liquid piston uses 6 mm diameter inserts to enhance heat transfer. Its performance is compared to that of the reciprocating compressor through a validated lumped parameter model and Aspen HYSYS thermodynamic simulations. For a compression ratio of 10 and a stroke time of 15 s, the final gas compression temperatures were 550 K, 492 K, and 319 K for the adiabatic process, liquid piston, and liquid piston with pipe inserts, respectively. The liquid piston with pipe inserts achieved near-isothermal compression (with a polytropic index of 1.1). Additionally, results indicated that enhancing surface area was significantly more effective at lowering the polytropic index of compression than increasing stroke time. The reverse Brayton cycle using the liquid piston configuration reduced specific energy by 39 % compared to the reciprocating compressor. This decrease in specific energy made the cycle competitive with other methane liquefaction cycles, producing 3.7 tonnes of liquid methane daily. The lower cooling requirements offered by the liquid piston with inserts resulted in an 83 % reduction in total exergy destruction within the compressor train.n.
Suggested Citation
Middleton, Luke & Bernagozzi, Marco & Morgan, Rob & Milton, Gareth & Atkins, Andy & Atkins, Penny, 2025.
"Energy and exergy analysis of liquid piston compression for small-scale methane liquefaction,"
Energy, Elsevier, vol. 330(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:energy:v:330:y:2025:i:c:s0360544225025757
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2025.136933
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:330:y:2025:i:c:s0360544225025757. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.