Author
Listed:
- Mei, Zhongya
- Xiao, Yaofang
- Li, Xinxing
- Wang, Chusheng
- Luo, Siyu
Abstract
Amidst the escalating threat of global warming driven by carbon emissions, China has pledged to achieve carbon peaking by 2030 and carbon neutrality by 2060, known as the dual carbon strategy. However, existing research on dual carbon-oriented policies lacks a comprehensive analysis and evaluation, especially combining quantitative and visual methods. To address this gap, this study examines dual carbon-oriented policies in mainland China using a framework integrating quantitative and visual analysis. This study aims to gain a deeper understanding of these policies and provide valuable insights for their enhancement. Employing the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Approach (PRISMA) for policy collection, followed by content analysis, Social Network Analysis (SNA), and the Policy Modeling Consistency (PMC) index model, this study conducts a quantitative and visual examination of the directly related policies across three dimensions: policy subjects, structures, and tools. The findings highlight the dominance of national-level policy subjects, notable regional variations in policy issuance, and a prediction for demand-side policy tools. Through PMC evaluation, pathways for policy enhancement are pinpointed, such as bolstering long-term planning, fostering cross-departmental collaboration, and improving regional policy coordination. Accordingly, pathway-dependent suggestions are provided, emphasizing comprehensive national planning, clarified policy objectives, and region-specific improvements aligned with identified deficiencies. This study contributes to the advancement of dual carbon-oriented policies in China and the global pursuit of sustainable development.
Suggested Citation
Mei, Zhongya & Xiao, Yaofang & Li, Xinxing & Wang, Chusheng & Luo, Siyu, 2025.
"Quantitative and visual analysis-based framework for dual carbon-oriented policies: Evidence from mainland China,"
Energy, Elsevier, vol. 330(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:energy:v:330:y:2025:i:c:s0360544225024958
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2025.136853
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:330:y:2025:i:c:s0360544225024958. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.