Author
Listed:
- Jiang, Luanjuan
- Li, Qianmu
- Chen, Xin
Abstract
This paper focuses on cybersecurity strategies for Electric Vehicle Charging Service Providers (EVSPs) within interconnected Electric Vehicle Charging Networks, considering cyber risk propagation and budget constraints. A novel muti-agent game-theoretic model is developed to capture competitive interactions among EVSPs and their strategic decision-making regarding cybersecurity investments and charging transactions. To solve for the Nash equilibrium, an adapted extra-gradient algorithm based on variational inequality theory is developed, achieving 33–50 % faster convergence than traditional methods such as Euler and projection-based algorithms as the network scales. Numerical analysis validates the model and investigates the impact of various factors on cybersecurity investments, cyber risk levels, and economic performance of EVSPs. Key findings include: (1) higher network density (more EVSPs) intensifies competition and cyber risk propagation, consequently reducing individual EVSP profits and cybersecurity investments; (2) increased risk propagation probability induces divergent investment strategies, with low-vulnerability EVSPs increase their investment while high-vulnerability ones decrease theirs, revealing free-riding behavior among EVSPs and emphasizing the need for targeted cybersecurity intervention; (3) heightened cybersecurity awareness among EV users leads to increased EVSP profits and cybersecurity investments across all providers, highlighting positive spillover effects where enhanced cybersecurity investment by one EVSP can indirectly benefit the entire network. These results offer actionable insights for designing regulatory frameworks, market-based incentives, and collaborative cybersecurity mechanisms that can strengthen the resilience of interconnected EVCNs.
Suggested Citation
Jiang, Luanjuan & Li, Qianmu & Chen, Xin, 2025.
"A novel multi-agent game-theoretic model for cybersecurity strategies in EV charging networks: Addressing risk propagation and budget constraints,"
Energy, Elsevier, vol. 330(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:energy:v:330:y:2025:i:c:s0360544225024892
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2025.136847
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:330:y:2025:i:c:s0360544225024892. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.