IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v329y2025ics036054422502345x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparative study on the performance, flexibility, and flow characteristics of very low head turbines: Numerical and experimental insights into original model and its optimized variant

Author

Listed:
  • Bahreini, Amir
  • Riasi, Alireza
  • Quaranta, Emanuele
  • Araghi, Mohammad Mahdi

Abstract

This study presents a comprehensive comparative analysis of the performance and flow characteristics of two Very Low Head (VLH) turbine models: an original and an optimized model. The original turbine is created utilizing an established algorithm for designing existing models, which was subsequently implemented to suit the experimental setup. The turbines were installed in an open channel within the Marine and Hydrokinetic Energies laboratory at the University of Tehran. Key parameters, including rotational speed, flow rate, head, and output power, were measured to evaluate the performance of the turbines. Characteristic curves for dimensionless parameters, including efficiency, head coefficient, and power coefficient against the flow coefficient were plotted and compared for both turbine models based on experimental findings. The results indicate a higher efficiency of the optimized turbine (79.51 %) compared to the efficiency of the original turbine (74.88 %) at their best efficiency points. Moreover, the optimized turbine exhibits greater output power across all operational conditions than the original model, reaching 38.27 W during BEP, while the power output of the original turbine at its BEP was 31.73 W, according to the experimental tests. Additionally, experimental data shows that the optimized turbine achieves a peak power output of 46.79 W, whereas the original turbine reaches 41.26 W. To gain insight into the complex flow physics, 3D transient computational fluid dynamic simulations (CFD) were carried out by Ansys CFX software. CFD simulations were carried out by using the homogeneous two-phase model for capturing free-surface flow, the SST turbulence model, and the Transient rotor/stator approach for modeling the flow physics at the rotating and stationary interfaces. While generally aligned with experimental results, the CFD simulations showed slight discrepancies, with a 7.69 % and 6.01 % higher turbine output power for the original and optimized turbines, respectively, compared to experimental data. Numerical analyses further underscored the performance gains achieved with the optimized model. Specifically, the optimized turbine exhibited an output power of 40.57 W at BEP compared to the 34.17 W of the original model. Furthermore, CFD results indicate that at this point, the efficiency of the optimized turbine is 84.31 %, whereas the original turbine's efficiency stands at 80.64 %. Factors such as mechanical losses, leaks, and manufacturing tolerances overlooked in simulations, along with limitations of the homogeneous model neglecting certain phase interaction losses, contribute to disparities between CFD simulations and experimental results. This study includes a comprehensive investigation utilizing the geometric attributes and fundamental principles of turbomachinery to elucidate the performance variations between turbine models.

Suggested Citation

  • Bahreini, Amir & Riasi, Alireza & Quaranta, Emanuele & Araghi, Mohammad Mahdi, 2025. "Comparative study on the performance, flexibility, and flow characteristics of very low head turbines: Numerical and experimental insights into original model and its optimized variant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 329(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:329:y:2025:i:c:s036054422502345x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2025.136703
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S036054422502345X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2025.136703?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:329:y:2025:i:c:s036054422502345x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.