Author
Listed:
- Wan, Kaidi
- Fan, Ying
- Liu, Bing-Yue
Abstract
The low-carbon transition has brought about new supply uncertainties, making preventing every possible disruption challenging. Since disruptions have become inevitable and unpredictable, enhancing the supply resilience to improve coping capacity after disruptions becomes increasingly critical. This study aimed to assess the global energy supply security from a resilience perspective. First, a diversified assessment framework of energy supply resilience was developed. Within this framework, 30 indicators were included. In addition to disruption threat indicators, it includes response resilience indicators that characterize the coping capacity to disruption. Using this indicator system, the Energy Supply Resilience Index (ESRI) was constructed as a proxy index of energy supply security in the low-carbon transition. An empirical evaluation of 80 countries from 2000 to 2019 followed. The study shows (1) The trends of energy supply resilience indicate a regional difference. Europe, the Americas, and Asia have notably improved, while Africa has experienced a decline. (2) Import security risks consistently are the core issue for energy supply security. The importance of response resilience factors is improving and may become central to future national competition in energy security. (3) In the diversified framework, 75 % of countries have changed their security grades, significantly shifting the global energy supply security landscape. Countries like France, Singapore, and Iceland demonstrate strong renewable energy development, enhancing their security during the low-carbon transition. In contrast, India, Poland, and nearly 90 % of African nations face serious challenges, risking energy poverty. Finally, policymakers should address weaknesses, and this study provides recommendations based on typical country characteristics.
Suggested Citation
Wan, Kaidi & Fan, Ying & Liu, Bing-Yue, 2025.
"Energy supply resilience under low-carbon transition: Long-term multi-national assessment,"
Energy, Elsevier, vol. 326(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:energy:v:326:y:2025:i:c:s036054422501953x
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2025.136311
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:326:y:2025:i:c:s036054422501953x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.