IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v326y2025ics0360544225019498.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Collaborative bidding optimization model for pumped storage plants participating in the electricity and flexible ramping markets considering multi-player game relationships: Case study of China

Author

Listed:
  • Wang, Peng
  • Zhang, Yushan
  • Ding, Yihong
  • Wang, Wentao
  • Cui, Zhengpai
  • Liu, Xiaoxue

Abstract

Optimizing the allocation of the pumped storage plants (PSP) and other flexible resources under electricity market (EM) is an effective measure to enhance the flexibility of power system. However, the strategic interactions between PSPs and other market players maybe influence the bidding strategies of PSPs in EM and flexible ramping market (FRM). To cope with this problem, firstly, a multi-player game relationship analysis framework is established between a PSP and other power market players. Secondly, a synergistic trading model, covering flexibility resource demand determination and virtual bidding curve formation for EM and FRM is designed. Lastly, simulations are conducted on an actual PSP, revealing that: 1) The proposed multi-player game relationship analysis framework increase the expected profit of the PSP by 1.79 % and improves the consumption rate of renewable energy by 1.64 %. 2) In FRM alone, the expected profit of the PSP increases by 0.22 %, indicating that the virtual bidding curve provides accurate compensation for the units supplying flexible ramping products. 3) Compared with a single profit model, when the multi-player game relationship and multi-market trading mode are considered, the PSP's profit increases by 2.78 %, indicating that the combination of multiple profit models can further enhance the profit margin.

Suggested Citation

  • Wang, Peng & Zhang, Yushan & Ding, Yihong & Wang, Wentao & Cui, Zhengpai & Liu, Xiaoxue, 2025. "Collaborative bidding optimization model for pumped storage plants participating in the electricity and flexible ramping markets considering multi-player game relationships: Case study of China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 326(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:326:y:2025:i:c:s0360544225019498
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2025.136307
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544225019498
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2025.136307?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:326:y:2025:i:c:s0360544225019498. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.