Author
Listed:
- Madadi, Meysam
- Kargaran, Ehsan
- Al Azad, Salauddin
- Saleknezhad, Maryam
- Zhang, Ezhen
- Sun, Fubao
Abstract
Biphasic pretreatment efficiently fractionates lignocellulosic biomass (LCB) and holds significant potential for industrial applications. While various studies have explored parameters to improve its efficiency, the lack of an optimal framework to balance these factors restricts scalability and compromises cost-effectiveness. This study introduces a machine learning (ML) model to optimize biphasic pretreatment conditions for LCB fractionation. By leveraging ML's capacity to uncover intricate relationships within extensive datasets, we conducted a comprehensive analysis incorporating key parameters. Feature importance analysis highlighted the critical influence of these parameters on cellulose degradation, hemicellulose removal, and delignification. The Gradient Boosted Regression (GBR) model outperformed others, achieving robust predictive metrics with R2 values from 0.71 to 0.94 and demonstrating lower error levels (RMSE: 5.27–9.51; MAE: 3.73–7.49) compared to other models during validation. Solid loading and temperature were identified as the most influential factors, contributing 23.7 % and 21.3 % to cellulose degradation, respectively. For hemicellulose removal, solid loading accounted for 41.8 %, while temperature contributed 25.3 % to delignification. The GBR-based optimization achieved 10.7 % cellulose degradation, 98.9 % hemicellulose removal, and 91.2 % delignification, with relative errors of 5.6 %, −6.8 %, and −2.2 % upon experimental validation. This ML model can revolutionize optimizing processing conditions for LCB fractionation, significantly reducing experimental time and costs while enhancing bioenergy production efficiency.
Suggested Citation
Madadi, Meysam & Kargaran, Ehsan & Al Azad, Salauddin & Saleknezhad, Maryam & Zhang, Ezhen & Sun, Fubao, 2025.
"Machine learning-driven optimization of biphasic pretreatment conditions for enhanced lignocellulosic biomass fractionation,"
Energy, Elsevier, vol. 326(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:energy:v:326:y:2025:i:c:s0360544225018833
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2025.136241
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:326:y:2025:i:c:s0360544225018833. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.