IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v324y2025ics0360544225013349.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Investigating the impact of demand-side flexibility on market-driven generation planning toward a fully decarbonized power system

Author

Listed:
  • Wang, Junkai
  • Qiu, Dawei
  • Wang, Yi
  • Ye, Yujian
  • Strbac, Goran

Abstract

The power system is undergoing a historic transition toward 100% renewable energy, posing significant challenges to operation of conventional power systems and energy markets due to the intermittency of renewable sources. In this context, flexible resources are being deployed to address these challenges, yet their market viability remains underexplored. This paper fills that gap by developing a bi-level optimization framework to assess the impact of flexibility on generation planning in energy markets. The upper-level problem models the profit-driven planning problem of the generation company, while the lower-level problems represent market clearing processes: one for day-ahead and real-time markets with carbon constraints, and another for the green certificate market. To account for uncertainties in demand and renewable generation, a chance-constrained approach is adopted, reformulated as a second-order conic program for tractability. The model is then transformed into a single-level mathematical program with equilibrium constraints using Karush–Kuhn–Tucker conditions and further recast as a mixed-integer quadratic program. There is a four-fold scope in terms of the examined case studies. First, they assess the benefits of demand flexibility within a deregulated market environment in terms of mitigating the massive renewable uncertainty. Second, they highlight the significant value of energy storage systems in integrating substantial renewable generation and guaranteeing stable system operation. Third, they rigorously validate the high levels of demand flexibility, in conjunction with the utility-scale energy storage systems, which not only ensure the stable operation of a 100% renewable power system but also guarantee adequate economic benefits. Finally, they demonstrate how flexibility resources play distinct roles in traditional and fully decarbonized power systems, and how they affect their respective business cases.

Suggested Citation

  • Wang, Junkai & Qiu, Dawei & Wang, Yi & Ye, Yujian & Strbac, Goran, 2025. "Investigating the impact of demand-side flexibility on market-driven generation planning toward a fully decarbonized power system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 324(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:324:y:2025:i:c:s0360544225013349
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2025.135692
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544225013349
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2025.135692?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Koltsaklis, Nikolaos E. & Liu, Pei & Georgiadis, Michael C., 2015. "An integrated stochastic multi-regional long-term energy planning model incorporating autonomous power systems and demand response," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 865-888.
    2. Roald, Line A. & Pozo, David & Papavasiliou, Anthony & Molzahn, Daniel K. & Kazempour, Jalal & Conejo, Antonio, 2023. "Power systems optimization under uncertainty: a review of methods and applications," LIDAM Reprints CORE 3257, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
    3. Hiroux, C. & Saguan, M., 2010. "Large-scale wind power in European electricity markets: Time for revisiting support schemes and market designs?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(7), pages 3135-3145, July.
    4. Qadrdan, Meysam & Cheng, Meng & Wu, Jianzhong & Jenkins, Nick, 2017. "Benefits of demand-side response in combined gas and electricity networks," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 192(C), pages 360-369.
    5. Abdin, Adam F. & Caunhye, Aakil & Zio, Enrico & Cardin, Michel-Alexandre, 2022. "Optimizing generation expansion planning with operational uncertainty: A multistage adaptive robust approach," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 306(PA).
    6. Gonzato, Sebastian & Bruninx, Kenneth & Delarue, Erik, 2021. "Long term storage in generation expansion planning models with a reduced temporal scope," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 298(C).
    7. Tsimopoulos, Evangelos G. & Georgiadis, Michael C., 2019. "Optimal strategic offerings for a conventional producer in jointly cleared energy and balancing markets under high penetration of wind power production," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 244(C), pages 16-35.
    8. Kwag, Kyuhyeong & Shin, Hansol & Oh, Hyobin & Yun, Sangmin & Kim, Tae Hyun & Hwang, Pyeong-Ik & Kim, Wook, 2023. "Bilevel programming approach for the quantitative analysis of renewable portfolio standards considering the electricity market," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(PD).
    9. Baringo, L. & Conejo, A.J., 2011. "Wind power investment within a market environment," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(9), pages 3239-3247.
    10. Wang, Y.X. & Chen, J.J. & Zhao, Y.L. & Xu, B.Y., 2024. "Incorporate robust optimization and demand defense for optimal planning of shared rental energy storage in multi-user industrial park," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 301(C).
    11. Qiu, Dawei & Xue, Juxing & Zhang, Tingqi & Wang, Jianhong & Sun, Mingyang, 2023. "Federated reinforcement learning for smart building joint peer-to-peer energy and carbon allowance trading," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 333(C).
    12. Wei, Zhinong & Yang, Li & Chen, Sheng & Ma, Zhoujun & Zang, Haixiang & Fei, Youdie, 2022. "A multi-stage planning model for transitioning to low-carbon integrated electric power and natural gas systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 254(PC).
    13. Kessides, Ioannis N., 2012. "The future of the nuclear industry reconsidered: Risks, uncertainties, and continued promise," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 185-208.
    14. Nguyen, Hieu T. & Felder, Frank A., 2020. "Generation expansion planning with renewable energy credit markets: A bilevel programming approach," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 276(C).
    15. Zheng, Yi & Wang, Jiawei & You, Shi & Li, Ximei & Bindner, Henrik W. & Münster, Marie, 2023. "Data-driven scheme for optimal day-ahead operation of a wind/hydrogen system under multiple uncertainties," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 329(C).
    16. Kessides, Ioannis N., 2012. "The future of the Nuclear industry reconsidered : risks, uncertainties, and continued potential," Policy Research Working Paper Series 6112, The World Bank.
    17. Uddin, Moslem & Romlie, M.F. & Abdullah, M.F. & Tan, ChiaKwang & Shafiullah, GM & Bakar, A.H.A., 2020. "A novel peak shaving algorithm for islanded microgrid using battery energy storage system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    18. Yoza, Akihiro & Yona, Atsushi & Senjyu, Tomonobu & Funabashi, Toshihisa, 2014. "Optimal capacity and expansion planning methodology of PV and battery in smart house," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 25-33.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Fei Guo & Hujun Li & Fangzhao Deng, 2025. "Evaluating the Power System Operational Flexibility with Explicit Quantitive Metrics," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(12), pages 1-17, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jaeyoung Lim & Kuk-Kyoung Moon, 2021. "Can Political Trust Weaken the Relationship between Perceived Environmental Threats and Perceived Nuclear Threats? Evidence from South Korea," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(18), pages 1-13, September.
    2. Zhang, Huaiyuan & Liao, Kai & Yang, Jianwei & Zheng, Shunwei & He, Zhengyou, 2024. "Frequency-constrained expansion planning for wind and photovoltaic power in wind-photovoltaic-hydro-thermal multi-power system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 356(C).
    3. Leurent, Martin & Jasserand, Frédéric & Locatelli, Giorgio & Palm, Jenny & Rämä, Miika & Trianni, Andrea, 2017. "Driving forces and obstacles to nuclear cogeneration in Europe: Lessons learnt from Finland," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 138-150.
    4. Youngho CHANG & Yanfei LI, 2014. "Non-renewable Resources in Asian Economies: Perspective of Availability, Applicability Acceptability, and Affordability," Working Papers DP-2014-04, Economic Research Institute for ASEAN and East Asia (ERIA).
    5. Carlos Vergara & Esteban Gil & Victor Hinojosa, 2024. "Generation and Transmission Expansion Planning Using a Nested Decomposition Algorithm," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-20, March.
    6. Bartnik, Ryszard & Hnydiuk-Stefan, Anna, 2025. "Evaluation of energy and economic efficiency in upgrading coal-fired power plants: Integrating HTGR reactors and turboexpanders for supercritical steam parameters," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 318(C).
    7. Brookes, Naomi J. & Locatelli, Giorgio, 2015. "Power plants as megaprojects: Using empirics to shape policy, planning, and construction management," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 57-66.
    8. Koltsaklis, Nikolaos E. & Dagoumas, Athanasios S., 2018. "State-of-the-art generation expansion planning: A review," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 230(C), pages 563-589.
    9. Lina Escobar Rangel & François Lévêque, 2012. "Revisiting the cost escalation curse of nuclear power: New lessons from the French experience," Working Papers hal-00780566, HAL.
    10. Zhou, Xianyang & Zhou, Dequn & Ding, Hao & Zhao, Siqi & Wang, Qunwei, 2023. "Low-carbon transition of China's provincial power sector under renewable portfolio standards and carbon cap," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 283(C).
    11. Elaheh Shobeiri & Filippo Genco & Daniel Hoornweg & Akira Tokuhiro, 2023. "Small Modular Reactor Deployment and Obstacles to Be Overcome," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-19, April.
    12. Hartmann, Patrick & Apaolaza, Vanessa & D'Souza, Clare & Echebarria, Carmen & Barrutia, Jose M., 2013. "Nuclear power threats, public opposition and green electricity adoption: Effects of threat belief appraisal and fear arousal," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 1366-1376.
    13. Vladimir M. Cvetković & Adem Öcal & Yuliya Lyamzina & Eric K. Noji & Neda Nikolić & Goran Milošević, 2021. "Nuclear Power Risk Perception in Serbia: Fear of Exposure to Radiation vs. Social Benefits," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-19, April.
    14. Huhtala, Anni & Remes, Piia, 2017. "Quantifying the social costs of nuclear energy: Perceived risk of accident at nuclear power plants," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 320-331.
    15. Alistair F. Holdsworth & Edmund Ireland, 2024. "Navigating the Path of Least Resistance to Sustainable, Widespread Adoption of Nuclear Power," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-15, March.
    16. Jonas Siegel & Elisabeth A. Gilmore & Nancy Gallagher & Steve Fetter, 2018. "An Expert Elicitation of the Proliferation Resistance of Using Small Modular Reactors (SMR) for the Expansion of Civilian Nuclear Systems," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 38(2), pages 242-254, February.
    17. Bjoern Hagen & Adenike Opejin & K. David Pijawka, 2022. "Risk Perceptions and Amplification Effects over Time: Evaluating Fukushima Longitudinal Surveys," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-18, June.
    18. Verbruggen, Aviel & Laes, Erik & Lemmens, Sanne, 2014. "Assessment of the actual sustainability of nuclear fission power," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 32(C), pages 16-28.
    19. Stephen Thomas & M. V. Ramana, 2022. "A hopeless pursuit? National efforts to promote small modular nuclear reactors and revive nuclear power," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Energy and Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 11(4), July.
    20. Leurent, Martin & Da Costa, Pascal & Jasserand, Frédéric & Rämä, Miika & Persson, Urban, 2018. "Cost and climate savings through nuclear district heating in a French urban area," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 616-630.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:324:y:2025:i:c:s0360544225013349. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.