IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v181y2019icp694-708.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation and comparison of saltation velocity correlations in the context of pulverised fuel transportation

Author

Listed:
  • Biobaku, Ayodimeji
  • Schmitz, Walter
  • Naidoo, Reshendren

Abstract

The reduction of harmful emissions is an important issue to be dealt with in coal-fired power stations. There are several technologies that have been successfully applied to modern power stations to reduce the emissions of oxides of sulphur and nitrogen. One such technology is low NOx burners, which employ directed fuel and air staging to create a NOx reduction zone. A requirement for effective operation is to supply these burners with a uniform stream of pulverised fuel (PF). A corequisite is to maintain a homogeneous flow through the pneumatic conveying system without particle settling. PF systems can be analysed and designed using semi-empirical correlations. Some correlations used in predicting settling were developed by Rizk [1], Matsumoto [2][3], Mewing [4], Rose and Duckworth [5], and Thomas [6]. These, however, were based on lab experimentations with pipe diameters and conveying mass flow rates much less than PF transport conditions and predictions show significant variability when the correlations are compared. This work compared the settling velocities predicted by various correlations in literature to an experimental study by Herbreteau and Bouard [7]. Correlations for saltation velocities by Rizk, Thomas and Matsumoto were noted as the more reliable of the correlations evaluated.

Suggested Citation

  • Biobaku, Ayodimeji & Schmitz, Walter & Naidoo, Reshendren, 2019. "Evaluation and comparison of saltation velocity correlations in the context of pulverised fuel transportation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 694-708.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:181:y:2019:i:c:p:694-708
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2019.05.199
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544219310874
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2019.05.199?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:181:y:2019:i:c:p:694-708. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.