IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/enepol/v216y2026ics0301421526002995.html

Who pays for rooftop solar? Cost shifts, stakeholder perspectives and policy tensions in South Africa

Author

Listed:
  • Dippenaar, Josh A.
  • Bekker, Bernard

Abstract

Rooftop solar is expanding rapidly across the world, raising concerns about utility revenue loss, cost recovery, and fairness in electricity pricing. This paper analyses the cost impacts of rooftop solar on South African municipalities, where over 10% of the national installed generation capacity now lies behind-the-meter, and examines how these impacts are framed by different stakeholder perspectives. Using data from 165 municipal electricity distributors, the study assesses widespread narratives – such as the belief that municipalities generate excess profits from electricity sales, or that solar users drive major cost shifts – and tests them against system-wide evidence. Findings reveal that most municipalities are under-recovering electricity costs and rely heavily on cross-subsidies to support low-income customers, making them vulnerable to even modest revenue erosion. While solar-related cost shifts do exist, they are moderate in scale and vary significantly across contexts. The analysis highlights deep institutional and governance constraints, conflicting stakeholder interests, and the need for regulatory responses that are guided by evidence rather than perception. Rooftop solar is not the root cause of South Africa's electricity distribution challenges, but it exposes underlying structural weaknesses that demand urgent attention.

Suggested Citation

  • Dippenaar, Josh A. & Bekker, Bernard, 2026. "Who pays for rooftop solar? Cost shifts, stakeholder perspectives and policy tensions in South Africa," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:enepol:v:216:y:2026:i:c:s0301421526002995
    DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2026.115365
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421526002995
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.enpol.2026.115365?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:enepol:v:216:y:2026:i:c:s0301421526002995. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/enpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.