IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/enepol/v210y2026ics0301421525005166.html

Ethanol vs. gasoline: conventional policies and the slow uptake

Author

Listed:
  • Fontana, Magda
  • Soares, Laura
  • Suriane, André

Abstract

Despite significant government interventions over the past five decades in Brazil, the adoption of ethanol as an alternative to gasoline remains well below the expected level. We utilise a novel dataset that covers all municipalities with operational gas stations, including data on ethanol and gasoline consumption, prices, socio-demographics, and state characteristics, to assess the impact of economic, demographic, and local factors (in the period 2020/9–2021/12), and to investigate the factors influencing fuel choice and the likely existence of barriers to ethanol adoption. Results indicate that non-economic factors, including education and age, influence ethanol adoption. State-level fiscal policies and economic vocations, such as sugarcane and oil production, also influence adoption. We argue that policies should go beyond traditional economic incentives and, instead, take a more comprehensive approach that addresses local conditions and promotes pro-social behaviours. In this vein, we propose several policy interventions inspired by behavioral economics to increase adoption, particularly among wealthier, younger, and less-educated citizens. Ultimately, the study recommends further research into the social and cognitive factors that influence fuel choice and the effectiveness of policy.

Suggested Citation

  • Fontana, Magda & Soares, Laura & Suriane, André, 2026. "Ethanol vs. gasoline: conventional policies and the slow uptake," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 210(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:enepol:v:210:y:2026:i:c:s0301421525005166
    DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2025.115009
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421525005166
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.enpol.2025.115009?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:enepol:v:210:y:2026:i:c:s0301421525005166. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/enpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.