IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/enepol/v207y2025ics0301421525003416.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimizing utility-scale solar siting for local economic benefits and regional decarbonization

Author

Listed:
  • Owusu-Obeng, Papa Yaw
  • Miller, Steven R.
  • Mills, Sarah Banas
  • Craig, Michael T.

Abstract

The Midwest's agricultural lands are increasingly targeted for utility-scale solar development, but traditional power planning often overlooks local economic impacts and the opportunity costs of converting farmland. This study integrates local economic metrics into a power system planning model to assess how economic benefits and agricultural trade-offs influence solar siting decisions. Focusing on counties within the Great Lakes region, we develop localized supply and marginal benefit curves within a multi-objective optimization framework that minimizes system costs while maximizing community economic benefits. Results show that counties with larger economies and less productive farmland deliver the highest local economic benefit per megawatt (MW)—reaching $34,500 in Ohio due to property tax revenues—while smaller counties generate 31 % less. Accounting for lost crop production reduces net benefits by up to 16 %, depending on farmland quality. A scenario prioritizing solar deployment in high-economic-return counties boosts cumulative benefits by $1 billion (11 %) by 2040, redirecting investment from Michigan and Wisconsin (down 39 %) to Ohio and Indiana (up 75 %), with only a marginal 0.5 % increase in system-wide costs. These findings underscore the importance of integrating economic considerations into utility-scale solar planning to better align decarbonization goals with regional and local economic development.

Suggested Citation

  • Owusu-Obeng, Papa Yaw & Miller, Steven R. & Mills, Sarah Banas & Craig, Michael T., 2025. "Optimizing utility-scale solar siting for local economic benefits and regional decarbonization," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 207(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:enepol:v:207:y:2025:i:c:s0301421525003416
    DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2025.114834
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421525003416
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.enpol.2025.114834?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:enepol:v:207:y:2025:i:c:s0301421525003416. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/enpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.