IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/enepol/v206y2025ics0301421525003131.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Governing flexibility: Trust, time and agency in automated demand-side flexibility

Author

Listed:
  • Poulter, Helen
  • Brisbois, Marie Claire

Abstract

Aligning electricity demand with renewable energy supply helps lower decarbonisation costs. This can be done through demand-side flexibility (DSF) markets, where users are rewarded for shifting their energy use to times of high renewable availability. However, participation is often limited due to complex incentives and users' limited ability or willingness to shift demand. Automation offers a solution but depends on users trusting the service providers—trust that is often lacking. We propose a conceptual framework connecting user time commitment and system enabled agency, examining how this influences trust in energy governance. We consider how consumer and competition policies can reduce user vulnerability and shift where trust is placed. Using secondary data, we apply this framework to three case studies—Australia, the UK, and New York State—analysing how governance processes support user trust, reduce vulnerability, or both. Should trust be a desired outcome, policy should be designed to reduce vulnerability by providing strong protections. Equally, users should be able to "trade" time to build trust in the system by participating in system governance, creating agency within automation. However, trust needs to be both deserved and maintained over time by the energy institutions for the acceptance of the automation of demand-side technologies.

Suggested Citation

  • Poulter, Helen & Brisbois, Marie Claire, 2025. "Governing flexibility: Trust, time and agency in automated demand-side flexibility," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 206(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:enepol:v:206:y:2025:i:c:s0301421525003131
    DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2025.114806
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421525003131
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.enpol.2025.114806?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:enepol:v:206:y:2025:i:c:s0301421525003131. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/enpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.