IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/enepol/v206y2025ics0301421525002964.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Protectionism's adverse impact on renewable energy deployment: evidence from the European Union's import duties on China-made photovoltaic panels

Author

Listed:
  • Cheng, Y.S.
  • Tsang, K.P.
  • Woo, C.K.

Abstract

Responding to the Paris Agreement on deep decarbonization, many countries have adopted industrial policies to promote their domestic manufacture of renewable energy equipment. If accompanied by protectionism, such policies impede renewable energy deployment that reduces the world's CO2 emissions caused by production and consumption of fossil fuels. Using the quasi-natural experiment data for 36 OECD countries in 2011–2018, this paper econometrically documents the adverse impact of protectionism on renewable energy deployment based on the European Union's (EU's) anti-dumping and anti-subsidy import duties that took effect in December 2013 on China-made photovoltaic panels (CPP). Its key finding is that these duties had reduced the annual growth in the EU's solar energy share of total electricity generation. This statistically significant (p-value ≤0.05) finding's policy implication is that had the EU not imposed these duties, its solar energy share growth could have been ∼0.7 % per year instead of the observed ∼0.2 % per year in the 2014–2018 period. The estimated difference of ∼0.5 % suggests an increase of ∼0.75 % in the EU electricity industry's CO2 emissions. Thankfully, the EU's import duties on CPP expired at the end of 2018, thus eliminating one of the adverse effects of protectionism on the world's quest for a clean and sustainable electricity future.

Suggested Citation

  • Cheng, Y.S. & Tsang, K.P. & Woo, C.K., 2025. "Protectionism's adverse impact on renewable energy deployment: evidence from the European Union's import duties on China-made photovoltaic panels," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 206(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:enepol:v:206:y:2025:i:c:s0301421525002964
    DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2025.114789
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421525002964
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.enpol.2025.114789?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:enepol:v:206:y:2025:i:c:s0301421525002964. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/enpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.