IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/enepol/v206y2025ics0301421525002927.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Castles in the Sky: Revisiting the global methane pledge

Author

Listed:
  • Guo, Jinling
  • Gao, Junlian
  • Yan, Kejia
  • Zhang, Bo
  • Liu, He

Abstract

The entry into force of the Global Methane Pledge (GMP) signifies a pivotal shift in climate governance, elevating methane (CH4) mitigation from a peripheral concern to a central global priority. While the GMP has significantly raised global ambition regarding CH4 reduction, the growing number of participations has yet to close the gap between pledges and actual implementation. This discrepancy arises from interrelated challenges related to the strength of mitigation commitments, data accuracy, regulatory scope, and technological readiness. A review of CH4 emissions inventories from 160 participants reveals that 77% lacked a 2020 baseline inventory, and the credibility of official data in several developed countries has also come under scrutiny. Most participants—including the European Union and the United States—have emphasized exploratory frameworks and policy rather than adopting concrete, quantitative reduction targets. Overall, CH4 mitigation efforts remain in an early development phase. Their future effectiveness will hinge on progress in four key areas: stronger mitigation commitments, enhanced data transparency, more comprehensive regulatory structures, and the deployment of innovative technologies. These findings underscore the urgent need for both participants and non-participants to strengthen international cooperation and activate untapped mitigation potential. Elevating CH4 reduction to a prominent position on the COP30 agenda and establishing a more binding framework for action will be crucial in the years ahead.

Suggested Citation

  • Guo, Jinling & Gao, Junlian & Yan, Kejia & Zhang, Bo & Liu, He, 2025. "Castles in the Sky: Revisiting the global methane pledge," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 206(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:enepol:v:206:y:2025:i:c:s0301421525002927
    DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2025.114785
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421525002927
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.enpol.2025.114785?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:enepol:v:206:y:2025:i:c:s0301421525002927. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/enpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.