IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/enepol/v206y2025ics0301421525002733.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does energy productivity boost total factor productivity?

Author

Listed:
  • Romero-Jordán, Desiderio
  • del Río, Pablo
  • Pinto, Fernando

Abstract

Decarbonising our economies and energy systems requires a more productive use of energy resources. Improving energy efficiency or, similarly, reducing energy intensity and increasing energy productivity are considered critical factors to achieve economic growth and reduce environmental impacts. In particular, energy productivity (EP), defined as the amount of economic output that is produced per unit of gross available energy, could have positive effects on green growth and competitiveness. However, the impact of EP on Total Factor Productivity (TFP), which is regarded as an important driver of changes in living standards, has not received much attention in the past. This paper fills this gap. Its aim is to analyse the impact of EP on TFP in 29 European countries between 2000 and 2022. The econometric analyses show that the effects are positive in both the short and long terms. Our findings lend credence to the Porter Hypothesis. They show that strict energy efficiency targets which enhance EP do not have a negative impact on economic performance in the long run. However, the less positive short-term effects compared to the long-term effects suggest that governments should consider mechanisms to cushion the immediate economic impacts of the transition towards more energy-efficient economic systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Romero-Jordán, Desiderio & del Río, Pablo & Pinto, Fernando, 2025. "Does energy productivity boost total factor productivity?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 206(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:enepol:v:206:y:2025:i:c:s0301421525002733
    DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2025.114766
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421525002733
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.enpol.2025.114766?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:enepol:v:206:y:2025:i:c:s0301421525002733. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/enpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.