IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/enepol/v206y2025ics0301421525002721.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

What people know about household energy use: assessing public understanding of energy consumption

Author

Listed:
  • Eisele, Lisa
  • Schubatzky, Thomas

Abstract

Improving public knowledge of everyday energy consumption holds considerable potential for promoting energy-saving behaviour in households. To support the design and evaluation of relevant educational and policy interventions, this study develops and validates a new measurement instrument to assess knowledge about everyday energy values. Key content areas were identified through extensive literature review to ensure content validity, and a range of item types was created. The instrument was refined through qualitative and quantitative pilot phases, with validity arguments collected at each stage. A cross-sectional survey conducted in German-speaking countries (N = 447) provided evidence for the instrument's validity. On average, participants answered 64 % of the test items correctly, with significant differences observed across socio-demographic groups (e.g. gender, age, education, and STEM affiliation). The findings highlight widespread gaps in everyday energy knowledge, particularly among younger and non-STEM populations. Given its demonstrated validity, the instrument can serve as a tool for assessing baseline knowledge and informing targeted interventions. Promoting practical energy knowledge among households may contribute to achieving national energy efficiency and climate policy goals.

Suggested Citation

  • Eisele, Lisa & Schubatzky, Thomas, 2025. "What people know about household energy use: assessing public understanding of energy consumption," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 206(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:enepol:v:206:y:2025:i:c:s0301421525002721
    DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2025.114765
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421525002721
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.enpol.2025.114765?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:enepol:v:206:y:2025:i:c:s0301421525002721. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/enpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.