IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/enepol/v206y2025ics0301421525002551.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

California’s community choice movement and a future of public energy governance

Author

Listed:
  • Taminiau, Job
  • Byrne, John

Abstract

A majority of United States electric power sector customers are served by shareholder-owned electric distributors. Critically, this design relegates people to the passive role of consumers as they interact through individual producer–consumer contract relations with the private utility company. Experimental strategies have emerged that elevate people to active participants in a public, collective decision-making process constituted of local, non-profit, and public authorities established by local governments. We show that the balance between private and public utility approaches is rapidly shifting in favor of public governance to the point where, for our case study of California, electricity service is now under majority public control. The observed transition has taken place in only a matter of years, undoing over a century of private sector dominance. This arresting finding reveals how public governance approaches can depose private utilities from their dominant position. We estimate that, by 2030, about two-thirds of California’s electricity market could be under public control.

Suggested Citation

  • Taminiau, Job & Byrne, John, 2025. "California’s community choice movement and a future of public energy governance," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 206(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:enepol:v:206:y:2025:i:c:s0301421525002551
    DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2025.114748
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421525002551
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.enpol.2025.114748?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:enepol:v:206:y:2025:i:c:s0301421525002551. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/enpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.