IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/enepol/v206y2025ics0301421525002344.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How public perceptions of unplanned power outage policies affect energy-saving behavioral intention: Evidence from China's social media mining

Author

Listed:
  • Yu, Shiwei
  • Zhao, Xingting
  • Fang, Xu
  • Sun, Ya-Fang
  • Guo, Yingying

Abstract

China's unplanned power outage (UPO) policies during extreme temperature events have sparked significant debate on social media. The impact of public perceptions of UPO policies on energy-saving behavioral intention remains unresolved. Hence, we explore this issue based on 76,392 social media posts related to China's UPO policies from 2021 to 2022, using text convolutional neural networks-bidirectional long short-term memory-attention and fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA). The findings reveal that: 1) Public perceptions of UPO policies primarily focus on concerns related to production and livelihoods, power grid construction, energy policies, and energy conservation. 2) 50.6 % of the public opposes UPO policies, citing concerns about the power transmission from Sichuan to other provinces for public's asymmetric understanding of UPO policies, as well as the potential negative impacts on work, the health and well-being of the elderly and children. In contrast, 30.2 % express support, emphasizing the importance of energy conservation and power system construction. 3) The fsQCA model identifies two distinct sets of core conditions that can independently enhance public energy-saving behavioral intention: one is public perceptions of power grid construction and extreme weather, while the other is public perceptions of salary and a negative attitude towards UPO policies.

Suggested Citation

  • Yu, Shiwei & Zhao, Xingting & Fang, Xu & Sun, Ya-Fang & Guo, Yingying, 2025. "How public perceptions of unplanned power outage policies affect energy-saving behavioral intention: Evidence from China's social media mining," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 206(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:enepol:v:206:y:2025:i:c:s0301421525002344
    DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2025.114727
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421525002344
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.enpol.2025.114727?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:enepol:v:206:y:2025:i:c:s0301421525002344. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/enpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.