IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/enepol/v205y2025ics0301421525002241.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Coal communities’ views on local economic Futures: Implications for energy transition policy and planning

Author

Listed:
  • Greenberg, Pierce
  • Asitibasi, Terence
  • Bodenhamer, Aysha

Abstract

Energy transition policies must consider the future of local communities that have been historically dependent on fossil fuel jobs, but policymakers face challenges in engaging with those communities. This problem is especially acute in southern West Virginia—which once had some of the largest reserves of coal in the U.S. but is now a region marred by socioeconomic and environmental challenges. While government agencies, private businesses, and non-profit organizations have proposed transition policies for the region, little research exists on how residents in southern West Virginia perceive the economic futures of their communities. Our research uses unique survey data from more than 500 respondents in southern West Virginia in 2017 to describe community sentiment about possible economic futures. We present both quantitative and qualitative data on what residents see as their community's most probable economic future. The results show that residents largely see fossil fuel extraction as continuing to support jobs in the future—and the renewable energy sector is among the industries they perceive as least likely to provide future jobs. Further, there are few demographic differences in these results. However, respondents are willing to consider alternatives to coal—especially those related to mine reclamation, tourism, and manufacturing. These findings highlight a disconnect between some large-scale transition policy proposals and communities' own views of transition.

Suggested Citation

  • Greenberg, Pierce & Asitibasi, Terence & Bodenhamer, Aysha, 2025. "Coal communities’ views on local economic Futures: Implications for energy transition policy and planning," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:enepol:v:205:y:2025:i:c:s0301421525002241
    DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2025.114717
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421525002241
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.enpol.2025.114717?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:enepol:v:205:y:2025:i:c:s0301421525002241. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/enpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.