IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/enepol/v205y2025ics0301421525002058.html

Applying multi-criteria decision analysis in the assessment of carbon dioxide removal technologies for Saudi Arabia

Author

Listed:
  • Odeh, Naser
  • Hunt, Julian David
  • Hejazi, Mohamad
  • Wada, Yoshihide

Abstract

This paper investigates the potential application of various carbon dioxide removal strategies within Saudi Arabia. It evaluates both traditional and innovative carbon dioxide removal solutions using a multi-criteria decision analysis approach. The study defines performance, economic, and environmental criteria, including factors such as technology readiness, CO2 permanence, costs, environmental impacts, and socio-economic co-benefits. Furthermore, it examines the policy and regulatory environment, as well as the feasibility and preparedness for monitoring, reporting, verification, and certification of different carbon dioxide removals. The analysis identifies five key groups of carbon dioxide removals for prioritization in Saudi Arabia: (i) energy-from-waste and biomethane production integrated with carbon capture, utilization, and storage, (ii) direct air capture, (iii) biomass pyrolysis producing biochar, (iv) conventional nature-based solutions, and (v) enhanced weathering. The study suggests that policies in the Kingdom should focus on diverting waste from landfills to 'energy-from-waste with carbon capture, utilization, and storage' facilities and on utilizing waste heat from industrial sites for direct air capture networks. By offering this detailed analysis, the paper seeks to provide valuable guidance for policymakers, researchers, and stakeholders in advancing carbon dioxide removal efforts in Saudi Arabia.

Suggested Citation

  • Odeh, Naser & Hunt, Julian David & Hejazi, Mohamad & Wada, Yoshihide, 2025. "Applying multi-criteria decision analysis in the assessment of carbon dioxide removal technologies for Saudi Arabia," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:enepol:v:205:y:2025:i:c:s0301421525002058
    DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2025.114698
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421525002058
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.enpol.2025.114698?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lefvert, Adrian & Grönkvist, Stefan, 2024. "Lost in the scenarios of negative emissions: The role of bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS)," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    2. Muhammad Adnan Hayat & Khalid Alhadhrami & Amro Elshurafa, 2023. "Challenges and Opportunities for Sustainable Deployment of Bioenergy with Carbon Capture and Storage Pathways (BECCS) Globally," Discussion Papers ks--2023-dp28, King Abdullah Petroleum Studies and Research Center.
    3. Wang, Jiang-Jiang & Jing, You-Yin & Zhang, Chun-Fa & Zhao, Jun-Hong, 2009. "Review on multi-criteria decision analysis aid in sustainable energy decision-making," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 13(9), pages 2263-2278, December.
    4. Rawat, Atul & Garg, Chandra Prakash & Sinha, Priyank, 2024. "Analysis of the key hydrogen fuel vehicles adoption barriers to reduce carbon emissions under net zero target in emerging market," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    5. Mayfield, Erin & Jenkins, Jesse & Larson, Eric & Greig, Chris, 2023. "Labor pathways to achieve net-zero emissions in the United States by mid-century," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 177(C).
    6. Maria Victoria Migo-Sumagang & Kathleen B Aviso & Dominic C Y Foo & Michael Short & Purusothmn Nair S Bhasker Nair & Raymond R Tan, 2023. "Optimization and decision support models for deploying negative emissions technologies," PLOS Sustainability and Transformation, Public Library of Science, vol. 2(5), pages 1-17, May.
    7. Lomax, Guy & Workman, Mark & Lenton, Timothy & Shah, Nilay, 2015. "Reframing the policy approach to greenhouse gas removal technologies," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 125-136.
    8. Stermieri, L. & Kober, T. & McKenna, R. & Schmidt, T.J. & Panos, E., 2024. "The role of digital social practices and technologies in the Swiss energy transition towards net-zero carbon dioxide emissions in 2050," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    9. Thamir Al Shehri & Jan Frederik Braun & Nicholas Howarth & Alessandro Lanza & Mari Luomi, 2023. "Saudi Arabia’s Climate Change Policy and the Circular Carbon Economy Approach," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(2), pages 151-167, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Domenech, B. & Ferrer-Martí, L. & Pastor, R., 2015. "Including management and security of supply constraints for designing stand-alone electrification systems in developing countries," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 359-369.
    2. Lin, Sheng-Hau & Zhao, Xiaofeng & Wu, Jiuxing & Liang, Fachao & Li, Jia-Hsuan & Lai, Ren-Ji & Hsieh, Jing-Chzi & Tzeng, Gwo-Hshiung, 2021. "An evaluation framework for developing green infrastructure by using a new hybrid multiple attribute decision-making model for promoting environmental sustainability," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    3. Xinglin Liu, 2025. "Carbon emission constraint: A catalyst for the shift from real economy to financialization?," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 46(1), pages 590-601, January.
    4. Ishizaka, Alessio & Siraj, Sajid & Nemery, Philippe, 2016. "Which energy mix for the UK (United Kingdom)? An evolutive descriptive mapping with the integrated GAIA (graphical analysis for interactive aid)–AHP (analytic hierarchy process) visualization tool," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 602-611.
    5. Pin Li & Jinsuo Zhang, 2019. "Is China’s Energy Supply Sustainable? New Research Model Based on the Exponential Smoothing and GM(1,1) Methods," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-30, January.
    6. P. Giovani Palafox-Alcantar & Dexter V. L. Hunt & Chris D. F. Rogers, 2020. "A Hybrid Methodology to Study Stakeholder Cooperation in Circular Economy Waste Management of Cities," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-30, April.
    7. Wang, Jiangjiang & Zhai, Zhiqiang (John) & Jing, Youyin & Zhang, Chunfa, 2010. "Optimization design of BCHP system to maximize to save energy and reduce environmental impact," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(8), pages 3388-3398.
    8. Kerschbaum, Alina & Trentmann, Lennart & Hanel, Andreas & Fendt, Sebastian & Spliethoff, Hartmut, 2025. "Methods for analysing renewable energy potentials in energy system modelling: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    9. Ba, Birome Holo & Prins, Christian & Prodhon, Caroline, 2016. "Models for optimization and performance evaluation of biomass supply chains: An Operations Research perspective," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(P2), pages 977-989.
    10. Hu, Xiao & Kang, Siqin & Ren, Long & Zhu, Shaokeng, 2024. "Interactive preference analysis: A reinforcement learning framework," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 319(3), pages 983-998.
    11. Georgiadou, Maria Christina & Hacking, Theophilus & Guthrie, Peter, 2012. "A conceptual framework for future-proofing the energy performance of buildings," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 145-155.
    12. Hong, Sanghyun & Bradshaw, Corey J.A. & Brook, Barry W., 2014. "South Korean energy scenarios show how nuclear power can reduce future energy and environmental costs," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 569-578.
    13. Domenech, B. & Ferrer-Martí, L. & Pastor, R., 2015. "Hierarchical methodology to optimize the design of stand-alone electrification systems for rural communities considering technical and social criteria," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 182-196.
    14. Michael O. Ukoba & Ogheneruona E. Diemuodeke & Mohammed Alghassab & Henry I. Njoku & Muhammad Imran & Zafar A. Khan, 2020. "Composite Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis for Optimization of Hybrid Renewable Energy Systems for Geopolitical Zones in Nigeria," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-27, July.
    15. Mostafa Shaaban & Jürgen Scheffran & Jürgen Böhner & Mohamed S. Elsobki, 2018. "Sustainability Assessment of Electricity Generation Technologies in Egypt Using Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-25, May.
    16. Gerard, Paul & Rafiee, Ahmad & Montalvan, Mario & Mahdi, Osamh & Kaya, Havvanur Feyza & Khalilpour, Kaveh, 2026. "The Africa-Europe energy interconnection: Assessing green hydrogen suppliers for France," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
    17. Monica Dumitrașcu & Ines Grigorescu & Alexandra Vrînceanu & Irena Mocanu & Bianca Mitrică & Cristina Dumitrică & Paul Șerban, 2025. "An indicator-based approach to assess and compare the environmental and socio-economic consequences of photovoltaic parks in Romania's development regions," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 27(10), pages 24963-25003, October.
    18. Hong, Sanghyun & Kim, Eunsung & Jeong, Saerok, 2023. "Evaluating the sustainability of the hydrogen economy using multi-criteria decision-making analysis in Korea," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 204(C), pages 485-492.
    19. Muhammad Riaz & Wojciech Sałabun & Hafiz Muhammad Athar Farid & Nawazish Ali & Jarosław Wątróbski, 2020. "A Robust q-Rung Orthopair Fuzzy Information Aggregation Using Einstein Operations with Application to Sustainable Energy Planning Decision Management," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-39, May.
    20. Gigih Rahmandhani Setyantho & Hansaem Park & Seongju Chang, 2021. "Multi-Criteria Performance Assessment for Semi-Transparent Photovoltaic Windows in Different Climate Contexts," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-21, February.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:enepol:v:205:y:2025:i:c:s0301421525002058. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/enpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.