IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/enepol/v205y2025ics0301421525002058.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Applying multi-criteria decision analysis in the assessment of carbon dioxide removal technologies for Saudi Arabia

Author

Listed:
  • Odeh, Naser
  • Hunt, Julian David
  • Hejazi, Mohamad
  • Wada, Yoshihide

Abstract

This paper investigates the potential application of various carbon dioxide removal strategies within Saudi Arabia. It evaluates both traditional and innovative carbon dioxide removal solutions using a multi-criteria decision analysis approach. The study defines performance, economic, and environmental criteria, including factors such as technology readiness, CO2 permanence, costs, environmental impacts, and socio-economic co-benefits. Furthermore, it examines the policy and regulatory environment, as well as the feasibility and preparedness for monitoring, reporting, verification, and certification of different carbon dioxide removals. The analysis identifies five key groups of carbon dioxide removals for prioritization in Saudi Arabia: (i) energy-from-waste and biomethane production integrated with carbon capture, utilization, and storage, (ii) direct air capture, (iii) biomass pyrolysis producing biochar, (iv) conventional nature-based solutions, and (v) enhanced weathering. The study suggests that policies in the Kingdom should focus on diverting waste from landfills to 'energy-from-waste with carbon capture, utilization, and storage' facilities and on utilizing waste heat from industrial sites for direct air capture networks. By offering this detailed analysis, the paper seeks to provide valuable guidance for policymakers, researchers, and stakeholders in advancing carbon dioxide removal efforts in Saudi Arabia.

Suggested Citation

  • Odeh, Naser & Hunt, Julian David & Hejazi, Mohamad & Wada, Yoshihide, 2025. "Applying multi-criteria decision analysis in the assessment of carbon dioxide removal technologies for Saudi Arabia," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:enepol:v:205:y:2025:i:c:s0301421525002058
    DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2025.114698
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421525002058
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.enpol.2025.114698?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:enepol:v:205:y:2025:i:c:s0301421525002058. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/enpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.