IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/enepol/v205y2025ics0301421525002009.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The governmental origins of American innovation in clean technologies

Author

Listed:
  • Wittstock, Nicolas

Abstract

Why is the US so productive in the invention of clean technology, despite relatively weak federal climate policy, deemed critical to provide incentives for related R&D investments? I argue that federal innovation policy actively pursued clean technology with renewed force since the early 2000s. Related policy has often been internal to federal agencies and not directly motivated by climate-related considerations. Concerns over energy security and demand for alternative energy technology by the Department of Defense (DoD) shifted federal R&D initiatives in favor of clean technologies in the early 2000s. The resulting initiatives have substantially impacted aggregate rates of invention in targeted technology classes. To make this case, I present a network analysis of over 140,000 patents and over 1.7 m patent citations, demonstrating that federal agencies have been the most important sources of invention within the US clean technology ecosystem since 2000. This study complicates the notion of the US as a climate policy laggard and demonstrates how state preferences over technology continue to shape the trajectory of innovation in the American political economy.

Suggested Citation

  • Wittstock, Nicolas, 2025. "The governmental origins of American innovation in clean technologies," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:enepol:v:205:y:2025:i:c:s0301421525002009
    DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2025.114693
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421525002009
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.enpol.2025.114693?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:enepol:v:205:y:2025:i:c:s0301421525002009. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/enpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.