IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/enepol/v205y2025ics0301421525001995.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Navigating wind energy siting in the U.S.: The role of permitting and siting regulations and public engagement

Author

Listed:
  • Gao, Xue
  • Zhou, Shan
  • Luo, Tian

Abstract

Wind energy is the leading source of renewable electricity in the U.S., yet achieving over 400 GW of capacity by 2050 for net-zero emissions remains challenging. Existing research predominantly examines the impact of technical factors and financial incentives on wind deployment, while limited attention has been given to the regulatory landscape of project siting and permitting at the state and local levels. This study investigates how wind energy siting policies, including local zoning ordinances and state-level public engagement rules, influence wind project siting decisions. The findings show that the comprehensiveness of ordinance policies is positively correlated with both the likelihood of hosting a wind project and the project's installed capacity, while stricter ordinance policies tend to be negatively associated with these siting outcomes. Furthermore, state-level public engagement rules that emphasize more procedural justice tend to lower the probability of hosting a wind project. By analyzing both national data and a Midwest subsample, this study offers comparative insights into the impact of state and local wind siting policies.

Suggested Citation

  • Gao, Xue & Zhou, Shan & Luo, Tian, 2025. "Navigating wind energy siting in the U.S.: The role of permitting and siting regulations and public engagement," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:enepol:v:205:y:2025:i:c:s0301421525001995
    DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2025.114692
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421525001995
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.enpol.2025.114692?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:enepol:v:205:y:2025:i:c:s0301421525001995. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/enpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.