IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/enepol/v204y2025ics030142152500165x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A tale of two (un)Just Transitions: the end of the coal-fired power plants in Portugal

Author

Listed:
  • Moreira, Ricardo

Abstract

This paper explores the social, economic, and environmental impacts of the closures of Portugal's two coal-fired power plants—Sines and Pego—in 2021, within the context of the Just Transition framework. Through a case study approach, it explores how the shutdown affected workers, communities, and regional economies, based on stakeholder discourses from government officials, unions, companies, and municipalities. The paper discusses the extent to which these closures represent a Just Transition, focusing on the presence/absence of dedicated policies. Despite promises of reskilling, job creation, and regional investments, significant challenges emerged, including delayed economic revitalization and a "Death Valley" period of unemployment. The study emphasizes the implications of lacking a clear governance process, social dialogue, and timely support mechanisms, which are essential to prevent further social disparity and economic loss. We highlight the critical role of policy measures and recommend rethinking social security systems to accommodate transitions to low-carbon economies.

Suggested Citation

  • Moreira, Ricardo, 2025. "A tale of two (un)Just Transitions: the end of the coal-fired power plants in Portugal," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 204(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:enepol:v:204:y:2025:i:c:s030142152500165x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2025.114658
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030142152500165X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.enpol.2025.114658?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:enepol:v:204:y:2025:i:c:s030142152500165x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/enpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.