IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/enepol/v129y2019icp1020-1033.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Should solid waste from shale gas development be regulated as hazardous waste?

Author

Listed:
  • Swiedler, Elaine W.
  • Muehlenbachs, Lucija A.
  • Chu, Ziyan
  • Shih, Jhih-Shyang
  • Krupnick, Alan

Abstract

In 1980, solid waste from oil and gas fields was exempt from US federal hazardous waste regulations (according to the US Environmental Protection Agency's Resources Conservation and Recovery Act, RCRA). However, recent developments in oil and gas extraction from deep shale formations warrant a closer look at this exemption. We obtained lab reports submitted to state regulators to characterize the solid waste generated from 231 shale gas wells in Pennsylvania. Of the 40 chemicals listed as toxic in RCRA, eight were present in our samples and two exceeded RCRA toxicity limits for classification as a hazardous waste (Ba and Cr). We also found overlap with chemicals listed in international lists of toxicity, suggesting that these wastes could pose health problems that would not be regulated by RCRA. Radiation in solid waste is regulated at the state-level; the maximum detected concentrations of radium-226 and radium-228 (51 picocuries/g and 8.87 picocuries/g, respectively) exceed the regulatory limits for landfills in Ohio and New York, however it is common practice to ship waste across state lines. Removing the RCRA oil and gas exemption would increase testing and reporting burdens but would leave most shale waste management practices unchanged while protecting against some hazardous outliers.

Suggested Citation

  • Swiedler, Elaine W. & Muehlenbachs, Lucija A. & Chu, Ziyan & Shih, Jhih-Shyang & Krupnick, Alan, 2019. "Should solid waste from shale gas development be regulated as hazardous waste?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 1020-1033.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:enepol:v:129:y:2019:i:c:p:1020-1033
    DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2019.02.016
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421519300990
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.enpol.2019.02.016?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:enepol:v:129:y:2019:i:c:p:1020-1033. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/enpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.