Author
Listed:
- Ge, Yujie
- Qu, Jiansheng
- Huang, Kemin
- Han, Jinyu
- Maraseni, Tek Narayan
- Liu, Lina
- Xu, Li
- Wang, Dai
- Zeng, Jingjing
- Li, Hengji
- Pei, Huijuan
- Gao, Xinyue
Abstract
Using large-scale household survey data collected in 2023 from 5,585 households across 108 Chinese cities, this study examines urban–rural disparities and regional heterogeneity in household carbon emissions (HCEs) and investigates their underlying driving mechanisms. Survey-based emission accounting supported by input–output analysis is combined with complementary ordinary least squares (OLS) regression and machine learning (ML) models to identify key drivers of per-capita HCEs. The results reveal a pronounced urban–rural gap in per-capita HCEs, with higher emissions in urban households driven mainly by service- and mobility-oriented consumption, while rural households rely more heavily on appliance- and basic energy uses. Regional heterogeneity is evident, with higher per-capita HCEs in the southern coastal and northeast regions and lower levels in the northwest and mid-Yangtze River regions, and interregional disparities narrower than in 2013. Daily consumption and energy-use factors emerge as the dominant drivers of per-capita HCEs, jointly accounting for over half of the total explanatory importance in the ML analysis. Household generational structure reduces per-capita HCEs primarily through larger household size, reflecting scale effects from shared resource use. These findings suggest that policy interventions should prioritize household energy transitions, low-carbon infrastructure provision, and consumption–lifestyle shifts to reduce per-capita HCEs while safeguarding living standards.
Suggested Citation
Ge, Yujie & Qu, Jiansheng & Huang, Kemin & Han, Jinyu & Maraseni, Tek Narayan & Liu, Lina & Xu, Li & Wang, Dai & Zeng, Jingjing & Li, Hengji & Pei, Huijuan & Gao, Xinyue, 2026.
"Disparities in household carbon emissions across urban–rural and regional dimensions: Evidence from large-scale field surveys,"
Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:158:y:2026:i:c:s0140988326002069
DOI: 10.1016/j.eneco.2026.109327
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:158:y:2026:i:c:s0140988326002069. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eneco .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.