Author
Listed:
- Zwickl-Bernhard, Sebastian
- Creti, Anna
- Neumann, Anne
Abstract
The EU introduced the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) to prevent carbon leakage from imports such as liquefied natural gas (LNG) and to align trade with its decarbonization goals. This study examines how the global LNG market evolves under the assumption that the EU’s CBAM is in effect. Specifically, it investigates: (i) how exchanged LNG volumes and market structures between exporters and importers shift in response to the CBAM; (ii) how related supply risks and upstream emissions are affected; (iii) how effective the CBAM is in reducing carbon leakage and rebalancing supply costs, risks, and emissions; and (iv) which policy options the EU could apply when recycling CBAM revenues to enhance its effectiveness. In order to answer these questions, this work numerically characterizes the global LNG market under the assumption that the EU’s CBAM is in effect. We introduce a multi-objective mixed-integer linear program designed to balance LNG supply costs, supply risks, and upstream emissions. The objective function of the model is to minimize the sum of LNG importers’ supply costs, associated supply risks, and supply concentration. Within the model, CBAM revenues can be recycled and redistributed to exporters to incentivize upstream emission reduction measures, which subsequently reduce their supply risk — a mechanism akin to a ”reward.” We examine the economic and geopolitical impacts under various medium-term scenarios. Including LNG in carbon pricing not only reshuffles trade dynamics but also generates revenues that could incentivize the effective upstream emission reduction of imports. Several promising avenues for future research remain, including exploring the effects of alternative redistribution rules within the policy framework and assessing their implications for equity and efficiency.
Suggested Citation
Zwickl-Bernhard, Sebastian & Creti, Anna & Neumann, Anne, 2026.
"The EU’s CBAM trinity in LNG supply: Modeling global trade flows, supply risks and upstream emissions,"
Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:157:y:2026:i:c:s0140988326001313
DOI: 10.1016/j.eneco.2026.109252
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:157:y:2026:i:c:s0140988326001313. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eneco .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.