IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/eneeco/v157y2026ics0140988326001209.html

Corrigendum to ‘Carbon–agriculture market connectedness under the EU ETS: Evidence on sectoral heterogeneity and market states’ [Energy Economics Volume 154, February 2026, 109160]

Author

Listed:
  • Yan, Kejia
  • Lin, Boqiang

Abstract

This study examines the dynamic connectedness structure between European Union Allowance (EUA) futures and agricultural commodity futures, with the aim of assessing how climate policy–related unintended economic impacts may be reflected across different agricultural sectors and market states. Rather than focusing on causal transmission, the analysis adopts a connectedness-based monitoring perspective, using futures markets as forward-looking indicators of evolving cost pressures and market sensitivities associated with climate policy implementation. Using daily data spanning all four trading phases of the EU Emissions Trading System (EU ETS) from 2007 to 2024, we document pronounced sectoral heterogeneity and state dependence in carbon–agriculture market linkages. Grain futures consistently exhibit directional dominance in their bilateral connectedness with EUA futures across market conditions, indicating strong structural resilience in staple food markets. In contrast, non-grain agricultural futures display greater heterogeneity, with their directional exposure to carbon market dynamics becoming more pronounced in later trading phases and under specific quantile conditions. These findings suggest that climate policy–related unintended economic impacts are unlikely to manifest uniformly across food systems, but may emerge more selectively along specific segments of the agricultural value chain and under particular market states. By highlighting where and when such sensitivities become more visible within market interactions, this study contributes to a more nuanced understanding of the broader economic implications of climate policy implementation, while offering a policy-relevant diagnostic framework that complements traditional price- or outcome-based evaluations.
(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)

Suggested Citation

  • Yan, Kejia & Lin, Boqiang, 2026. "Corrigendum to ‘Carbon–agriculture market connectedness under the EU ETS: Evidence on sectoral heterogeneity and market states’ [Energy Economics Volume 154, February 2026, 109160]," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:157:y:2026:i:c:s0140988326001209
    DOI: 10.1016/j.eneco.2026.109241
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140988326001209
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.eneco.2026.109241?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version below or

    for a different version of it.

    Other versions of this item:

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:157:y:2026:i:c:s0140988326001209. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eneco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.