IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/eneeco/v157y2026ics0140988326001015.html

Do financial technology and clean bonds reshape risk spillovers in sectoral equity markets? A quantile-based assessment using the US case

Author

Listed:
  • Hossain, Mohammad Razib
  • Doğan, Buhari
  • Tiwari, Aviral Kumar
  • Naeem, Muhammad Abubakr

Abstract

Financial resource diversification is a panacea to inhibit portfolio risks and ensure societal upliftment. Financial technologies (Fintech) and eco-friendly bonds can reshape this diversification process, enabling investors to invest in multiple sectors effectively. However, the empirical narrative on how Fintech and eco-friendly bonds can elevate the potential of sectoral equity markets to attract investors is limited. To fill this gap, we document the causal connectedness and distributional predictability between Fintech, eco-friendly bonds, and sectoral equity markets in the USA. Several statistical techniques, such as Cross-quantilogram Correlation (CQC), causality-in-quantile (CQ), and quantile-on-quantile heat maps, are used. Our findings unfold as follows: Fintech and eco-friendly bonds hold strong predictive power in explaining the return variations in the sectoral equity markets. The distributional predictability findings indicate that when the market is in a boom period, negative directional predictability is noted between Fintech and sectoral equity markets, and green bond and sectoral equity markets, indicating that a small shock in the prices of Fintech and green bonds may unleash a significant change in the return of the stocks in the sectoral equity markets. This observation makes Fintech and eco-friendly bonds the perfect hedge with optimum financial risk minimization capacities. Moreover, hedging support from Fintech and eco-friendly bonds is prominent in extreme quantiles. Fintech provides hedging support for all sectoral equity markets, whereas eco-friendly bonds do not provide support for stock markets related to real estate, consumer staples, and utilities. Overall, Fintech and eco-friendly bonds provide multi-way shock absorption capabilities in the studied markets, with several policy implications.

Suggested Citation

  • Hossain, Mohammad Razib & Doğan, Buhari & Tiwari, Aviral Kumar & Naeem, Muhammad Abubakr, 2026. "Do financial technology and clean bonds reshape risk spillovers in sectoral equity markets? A quantile-based assessment using the US case," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:157:y:2026:i:c:s0140988326001015
    DOI: 10.1016/j.eneco.2026.109222
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140988326001015
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.eneco.2026.109222?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • C14 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General - - - Semiparametric and Nonparametric Methods: General
    • G11 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Portfolio Choice; Investment Decisions
    • G15 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - International Financial Markets
    • G24 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Investment Banking; Venture Capital; Brokerage

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:157:y:2026:i:c:s0140988326001015. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eneco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.