IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/eneeco/v151y2025ics0140988325007285.html

Intellectual property protection, green technology innovation, and energy transition: An evolutionary game analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Du, Wenhao
  • He, Qizhi
  • Wu, Junjun

Abstract

This paper develops an evolutionary game model of heterogeneous firms operating under an intellectual property (IP) protection regime to analyze the co-evolutionary mechanisms and micro-level decision thresholds through which IP protection facilitates green technological innovation and energy transition. The results indicate that achieving a desirable equilibrium of effective protection, active innovation, and accelerated transition relies on the coordinated implementation of three policy instruments: IP protection, innovation subsidies, and environmental regulation. The absence or misalignment of any policy tool may lead the system to an undesirable equilibrium marked by transition stagnation. An optimal threshold for IP enforcement intensity is identified. This threshold is negatively correlated with enforcement costs at the institutional level but positively correlated with the economic benefits and life cycle of green technologies at the technological level. The follower firm exhibits the slowest innovation response, and its sustained innovation depends on a compensatory policy mix that combines IP enforcement with innovation subsidies. While higher prices for green technologies incentivize R&D, they also hinder diffusion. This study fills a theoretical gap in the literature concerning the multi-agent interaction mechanisms guiding energy transition through innovation institutions and provides a theoretical foundation for constructing a green-oriented IP policy system.

Suggested Citation

  • Du, Wenhao & He, Qizhi & Wu, Junjun, 2025. "Intellectual property protection, green technology innovation, and energy transition: An evolutionary game analysis," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:151:y:2025:i:c:s0140988325007285
    DOI: 10.1016/j.eneco.2025.108901
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140988325007285
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.eneco.2025.108901?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zou, Chen & Huang, Yongchun & Hu, Shiliang & Huang, Zhan, 2023. "Government participation in low-carbon technology transfer: An evolutionary game study," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    2. Cai, Xiqian & Lu, Yi & Wu, Mingqin & Yu, Linhui, 2016. "Does environmental regulation drive away inbound foreign direct investment? Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 73-85.
    3. Reenu, 2008. "Role of Economic Reform in the Growth of Indian Economy," Journal of Commerce and Trade, Society for Advanced Management Studies, vol. 3(1), pages 19-22, April.
    4. Lily H. Fang & Josh Lerner & Chaopeng Wu, 2017. "Intellectual Property Rights Protection, Ownership, and Innovation: Evidence from China," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 30(7), pages 2446-2477.
    5. Daniel Friedman, 1998. "On economic applications of evolutionary game theory," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 8(1), pages 15-43.
    6. Boldrin,Michele & Levine,David K., 2010. "Against Intellectual Monopoly," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521127264, Enero-Abr.
    7. David Popp, 2010. "Innovation and Climate Policy," NBER Working Papers 15673, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    8. Zhao, Ziyi & Zhao, Yuhuan & Lv, Xin & Li, Xiaoping & Zheng, Lu & Fan, Shunan & Zuo, Sumin, 2024. "Environmental regulation and green innovation: Does state ownership matter?," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).
    9. Robert P. Bremner & Kathleen M. Eisenhardt, 2022. "Organizing Form, Experimentation, and Performance: Innovation in the Nascent Civilian Drone Industry," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 33(4), pages 1645-1674, July.
    10. Nordhaus, William D, 1969. "An Economic Theory of Technological Change," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 59(2), pages 18-28, May.
    11. Athreye, Suma & Kathuria, Vinish & Martelli, Alessandro & Piscitello, Lucia, 2023. "Intellectual property rights and the international transfer of climate change mitigating technologies," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(9).
    12. David Popp, 2010. "Innovation and Climate Policy," Annual Review of Resource Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 2(1), pages 275-298, October.
    13. Herbert A. Simon, 1955. "A Behavioral Model of Rational Choice," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 69(1), pages 99-118.
    14. Jean Tirole, 1988. "The Theory of Industrial Organization," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 1, volume 1, number 0262200716, December.
    15. Hossain, Mohammad Razib & Rao, Amar & Sharma, Gagan Deep & Dev, Dhairya & Kharbanda, Aeshna, 2024. "Empowering energy transition: Green innovation, digital finance, and the path to sustainable prosperity through green finance initiatives," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).
    16. Sen, Kanchan Kumar & Karmaker, Shamal Chandra & Chapman, Andrew J. & Saha, Bidyut Baran, 2025. "How does environmental policy shape the impact of energy innovation funding on renewable energy generation? Evidence from econometric and machine learning approaches," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    17. Daron Acemoglu & Simon Johnson & James A. Robinson, 2001. "The Colonial Origins of Comparative Development: An Empirical Investigation," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 91(5), pages 1369-1401, December.
    18. Daron Acemoglu & Ufuk Akcigit & Harun Alp & Nicholas Bloom & William Kerr, 2018. "Innovation, Reallocation, and Growth," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 108(11), pages 3450-3491, November.
    19. Masahiko Aoki, 2001. "Toward a Comparative Institutional Analysis," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 1, volume 1, number 0262011875, December.
    20. Zhang, Xiangguo & Zhao, Weiyi & Xie, Danxia, 2024. "Environmental regulation, academic top managers and green innovation: Evidence from China," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 69(PB).
    21. Aghion, Philippe & Akcigit, Ufuk & Howitt, Peter, 2014. "What Do We Learn From Schumpeterian Growth Theory?," Handbook of Economic Growth, in: Philippe Aghion & Steven Durlauf (ed.), Handbook of Economic Growth, edition 1, volume 2, chapter 0, pages 515-563, Elsevier.
    22. Brüggemann, Julia & Crosetto, Paolo & Meub, Lukas & Bizer, Kilian, 2016. "Intellectual property rights hinder sequential innovation. Experimental evidence," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(10), pages 2054-2068.
    23. Yang, Lei & Maskus, Keith E., 2009. "Intellectual property rights, technology transfer and exports in developing countries," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 90(2), pages 231-236, November.
    24. Albino-Pimentel, João & Dussauge, Pierre & El Nayal, Omar, 2022. "Intellectual property rights, non-market considerations and foreign R&D investments," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(2).
    25. Julia Brüggemann & Paolo Crosetto & Lukas Meub & Kilian Bizer, 2016. "Intellectual property rights hinder sequential innovation: experimental evidence," Post-Print hal-01997135, HAL.
    26. Yuan, Ning & Li, Meijuan, 2024. "Research on collaborative innovation behavior of enterprise innovation ecosystem under evolutionary game," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 206(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Balazs Egert, 2026. "Spinning Jennies and Silicon: The Economics of Innovating or Evaporating – Creative Destruction and Public Policies," CESifo Working Paper Series 12572, CESifo.
    2. Douglas Hanley, 2014. "Innovation, Technological Interdependence, and Economic Growth," Working Paper 533, Department of Economics, University of Pittsburgh, revised Jan 2014.
    3. Aghion, Philippe & Akcigit, Ufuk & Howitt, Peter, 2014. "What Do We Learn From Schumpeterian Growth Theory?," Handbook of Economic Growth, in: Philippe Aghion & Steven Durlauf (ed.), Handbook of Economic Growth, edition 1, volume 2, chapter 0, pages 515-563, Elsevier.
    4. repec:ehl:lserod:116945 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. repec:nbp:nbpbik:v:47:y:2016:i:6:p:463-494 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Benslimane, Ismaël & Crosetto, Paolo & Magni-Berton, Raul & Varaine, Simon, 2023. "Intellectual property reform in the laboratory," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 206(C), pages 204-221.
    7. Douglas Hanley, 2015. "Innovation, Technological Interdependence, and Economic Growth," 2015 Meeting Papers 1491, Society for Economic Dynamics.
    8. Gugler, Klaus & Szücs, Florian & Wiedenhofer, Thomas, 2024. "Environmental Policies and directed technological change," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 124(C).
    9. Jeffrey Clemens & Parker Rogers, 2026. "Demand Shocks, Procurement Policies, and the Nature of Medical Innovation: Evidence from Wartime Prosthetic Device Patents," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 108(1), pages 75-89, January.
    10. Fidrmuc, Jarko & Siddiqui, Martin, 2015. "Institutions and Creative Destruction in CEECs: Determinants of Inefficient Use of Assets," VfS Annual Conference 2015 (Muenster): Economic Development - Theory and Policy 113201, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    11. Pengfei Cheng & Yuhao Wang & Mengzhen Wang, 2024. "Does intellectual property rights protection help reduce carbon emissions?," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-15, December.
    12. Viglioni, Marco Túlio Dinali & Calegario, Cristina Lelis Leal & Aveline, Carlos Eduardo Stefaniak & Ferreira, Manuel Portugal & Borini, Felipe Mendes & Bruhn, Nádia Campos Pereira, 2023. "Effects of intellectual property rights on innovation and economic activity: A non-linear perspective from Latin America," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 359-371.
    13. Andres, Pia, 2022. "Was the trade war justified? Solar PV innovation in Europe and the impact of the ‘China shock’," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 116943, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    14. Yang, Haodong & Zhang, Yumei & Wang, Gaofeng & Liu, Li, 2025. "Intellectual property governance and academic technology transfer," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    15. Troy Tassier, 2013. "Handbook of Research on Complexity, by J. Barkley Rosser, Jr. and Edward Elgar," Eastern Economic Journal, Palgrave Macmillan;Eastern Economic Association, vol. 39(1), pages 132-133.
    16. Changfei Nie & Ziyan Qi & Yuan Feng, 2024. "Intellectual property judicial protection, innovation factor input, and corporate innovation: Evidence from the establishment of intellectual property courts in China," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 45(6), pages 4227-4239, September.
    17. Philippe Aghion & Peter Howitt & Susanne Prantl, 2015. "Patent rights, product market reforms, and innovation," Journal of Economic Growth, Springer, vol. 20(3), pages 223-262, September.
    18. Dugoua, Eugenie & Dumas, Marion, 2021. "Green product innovation in industrial networks: A theoretical model," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    19. Wang, Chunyang, 2025. "Is environmental regulation an incentive or an obstacle to green innovation?," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 52-68.
    20. lv, Kangjuan & Pan, Minjie & Huang, Li & Song, Daqiang & Qian, Xinlei, 2023. "Can intellectual property rights protection reduce air pollution? A quasi-natural experiment from China," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 210-222.
    21. Antonio Doria, Francisco, 2011. "J.B. Rosser Jr. , Handbook of Research on Complexity, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK--Northampton, MA, USA (2009) 436 + viii pp., index, ISBN 978 1 84542 089 5 (cased)," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 78(1-2), pages 196-204, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:151:y:2025:i:c:s0140988325007285. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eneco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.