IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/eneeco/v150y2025ics0140988325006991.html

Decarbonising the UK pulp, paper and printing sector: Balancing sustainability and global competitiveness through insights from LMDI and MRIO analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Ibn-Mohammed, T.
  • Serrenho, A.C.
  • Fujii, H.
  • Acquaye, A.
  • Morrison-Saunders, A.

Abstract

The United Kingdom's pulp, paper, and printing sector (UKPPP) contributes ∼6 % of the nation's industrial CO2 emissions. While these emissions have declined since 2000, mainly because roughly half its paper mills closed due to global competitiveness challenges, other factors influencing emission dynamics (e.g., carbon intensity, energy intensity, fossil fuel dependency, economic structure, and activities) remain quantitatively unevaluated in comparison to other top global PPP countries (TGPPP). Additionally, the UKPPP relies on imports from TGPPP. Yet, a comprehensive modelling of the ecological CO2 emission exchanges and a comparison of sectoral production structures and emission dynamics between these entities have not been conducted. This analytical gap hinders the gauging of the effectiveness of decarbonisation plans, impacting wider UK climate policy. Consequently, this paper employs a two-step, top-down modelling approach, utilising logarithmic mean divisia index and environmentally-extended multi-region input-output frameworks to examine the sectoral emission driving factors between 2000 and 2019. The analysis reveals that across the aggregate 20-year period, efficiency gains from improved energy intensity contributed minimally to emission mitigation, despite overall improvements in carbon intensity and reduced fossil fuel dependency, primarily induced by an increased proportion of solid biomass and biogas. Importantly, despite the UKPPP's improved carbon intensity, CO2 emissions are effectively leaking to other TGPPP, with the exception of Russia, where the UK is a net exporter of emissions, highlighting a critical need to rethink current bilateral trading mechanisms. Macro-level sector-specific strategies encompassing new circular business models, supply-chain re-configurations, and consumption-based carbon budgeting to both decarbonise the UKPPP and keep it globally competitive are proposed.

Suggested Citation

  • Ibn-Mohammed, T. & Serrenho, A.C. & Fujii, H. & Acquaye, A. & Morrison-Saunders, A., 2025. "Decarbonising the UK pulp, paper and printing sector: Balancing sustainability and global competitiveness through insights from LMDI and MRIO analysis," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:150:y:2025:i:c:s0140988325006991
    DOI: 10.1016/j.eneco.2025.108872
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140988325006991
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.eneco.2025.108872?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Schymura, Michael & Voigt, Sebastian, 2014. "What drives changes in carbon emissions? An index decomposition approach for 40 countries," ZEW Discussion Papers 14-038, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    2. Ang, B.W., 2015. "LMDI decomposition approach: A guide for implementation," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 233-238.
    3. Acquaye, Adolf & Ibn-Mohammed, Taofeeq & Genovese, Andrea & Afrifa, Godfred A & Yamoah, Fred A & Oppon, Eunice, 2018. "A quantitative model for environmentally sustainable supply chain performance measurement," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 269(1), pages 188-205.
    4. Ma, Xiaotian & Shen, Xiaoxu & Qi, Congcong & Ye, Liping & Yang, Donglu & Hong, Jinglan, 2018. "Energy and carbon coupled water footprint analysis for Kraft wood pulp paper production," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 253-261.
    5. Arnold Tukker & Hector Pollitt & Maurits Henkemans, 2020. "Consumption-based carbon accounting: sense and sensibility," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(S1), pages 1-13, April.
    6. Stijn Van Ewijk & Julia A. Stegemann & Paul Ekins, 2018. "Global Life Cycle Paper Flows, Recycling Metrics, and Material Efficiency," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 22(4), pages 686-693, August.
    7. Zengkai Zhang & Dabo Guan & Ran Wang & Jing Meng & Heran Zheng & Kunfu Zhu & Huibin Du, 2020. "Embodied carbon emissions in the supply chains of multinational enterprises," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 10(12), pages 1096-1101, December.
    8. Karen Fisher-Vanden & Yong Hu & Gary Jefferson & Michael Rock & Michael Toman, 2016. "Factors Influencing Energy Intensity in Four Chinese Industries," The Energy Journal, , vol. 37(1_suppl), pages 153-178, January.
    9. Furszyfer Del Rio, Dylan D. & Sovacool, Benjamin K. & Griffiths, Steve & Bazilian, Morgan & Kim, Jinsoo & Foley, Aoife M. & Rooney, David, 2022. "Decarbonizing the pulp and paper industry: A critical and systematic review of sociotechnical developments and policy options," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    10. Stijn Ewijk & Julia A. Stegemann & Paul Ekins, 2021. "Limited climate benefits of global recycling of pulp and paper," Nature Sustainability, Nature, vol. 4(2), pages 180-187, February.
    11. Oppon, Eunice & Acquaye, Adolf & Ibn-Mohammed, Taofeeq & Koh, Lenny, 2018. "Modelling Multi-regional Ecological Exchanges: The Case of UK and Africa," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 422-435.
    12. Susaeta, Andres & Rossato, Fabricia Gladys, 2021. "Efficiency of pulp and paper industry in the production of pulp and bioelectricity in Brazil," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 128(C).
    13. Marcel P. Timmer & Erik Dietzenbacher & Bart Los & Robert Stehrer & Gaaitzen J. Vries, 2015. "An Illustrated User Guide to the World Input–Output Database: the Case of Global Automotive Production," Review of International Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 23(3), pages 575-605, August.
    14. Wen, Hong-xing & Chen, Zhe & Yang, Qian & Liu, Jin-yi & Nie, Pu-yan, 2022. "Driving forces and mitigating strategies of CO2 emissions in China: A decomposition analysis based on 38 industrial sub-sectors," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 245(C).
    15. Dorninger, Christian & Hornborg, Alf & Abson, David J. & von Wehrden, Henrik & Schaffartzik, Anke & Giljum, Stefan & Engler, John-Oliver & Feller, Robert L. & Hubacek, Klaus & Wieland, Hanspeter, 2021. "Global patterns of ecologically unequal exchange: Implications for sustainability in the 21st century," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    16. Sun, Mingxing & Wang, Yutao & Shi, Lei & Klemeš, Jiří Jaromír, 2018. "Uncovering energy use, carbon emissions and environmental burdens of pulp and paper industry: A systematic review and meta-analysis," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 823-833.
    17. Chuanbin Zhou & Shijun Ma & Xiao Yu & Zhuqi Chen & Jingru Liu & Li Yan, 2022. "A comparison study of bottom‐up and top‐down methods for analyzing the physical composition of municipal solid waste," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 26(1), pages 240-251, February.
    18. Trotta, Gianluca, 2020. "Assessing energy efficiency improvements and related energy security and climate benefits in Finland: An ex post multi-sectoral decomposition analysis," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    19. Hammond, G.P. & Norman, J.B., 2012. "Decomposition analysis of energy-related carbon emissions from UK manufacturing," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 41(1), pages 220-227.
    20. Kong, Lingbo & Hasanbeigi, Ali & Price, Lynn & Liu, Huanbin, 2017. "Energy conservation and CO2 mitigation potentials in the Chinese pulp and paper industry," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 117(PA), pages 74-84.
    21. Hauke Ward & Leonie Wenz & Jan C. Steckel & Jan C. Minx, 2018. "Truncation Error Estimates in Process Life Cycle Assessment Using Input‐Output Analysis," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 22(5), pages 1080-1091, October.
    22. Kim, Yeonbae & Worrell, Ernst, 2002. "International comparison of CO2 emission trends in the iron and steel industry," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 30(10), pages 827-838, August.
    23. repec:aen:journl:ej37-si1-fishervanden is not listed on IDEAS
    24. Goh, Tian & Ang, B.W. & Su, Bin & Wang, H., 2018. "Drivers of stagnating global carbon intensity of electricity and the way forward," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 149-156.
    25. Karikallio, Hanna & Mäki-Fränti, Petri & Suhonen, Niko, 2011. "Competition in the global pulp and paper industries - An evaluation based on three approaches," Journal of Forest Economics, Elsevier, vol. 17(1), pages 91-104, January.
    26. Benedikt Bruckner & Yuli Shan & Christina Prell & Yannan Zhou & Honglin Zhong & Kuishuang Feng & Klaus Hubacek, 2023. "Ecologically unequal exchanges driven by EU consumption," Nature Sustainability, Nature, vol. 6(5), pages 587-598, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Furszyfer Del Rio, Dylan D. & Sovacool, Benjamin K. & Griffiths, Steve & Bazilian, Morgan & Kim, Jinsoo & Foley, Aoife M. & Rooney, David, 2022. "Decarbonizing the pulp and paper industry: A critical and systematic review of sociotechnical developments and policy options," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    2. Wang, Hui & Yu, Shasha & Yang, Yafei & Wang, Meiyue & Zhou, Peng, 2025. "Assessing carbon emissions along global supply chains from technology perspective: A network production decomposition analysis," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 233(C).
    3. Ali, Mohammed & Evans, Steve, 2025. "The impact of best practice on energy efficiency in industrial decarbonization policy," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 204(C).
    4. Long, Tengju & Wu, Ge & Miao, Zhuang & Chen, Xiaodong, 2024. "Quantifying consumption-based environmental productivity from “Energy-Environment Footprints”," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 313(C).
    5. Fernández-Amador, Octavio & Francois, Joseph F. & Oberdabernig, Doris A. & Tomberger, Patrick, 2023. "Energy footprints and the international trade network: A new dataset. Is the European Union doing it better?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 204(PA).
    6. Pérez-Sánchez, Laura & Velasco-Fernández, Raúl & Giampietro, Mario, 2021. "The international division of labor and embodied working time in trade for the US, the EU and China," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).
    7. Tunç, Gül İpek & Akbostancı, Elif & Türüt-Aşık, Serap, 2022. "Ecological unequal exchange between Turkey and the European Union: An assessment from value added perspective," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    8. Zhou, P. & Zhang, H. & Zhang, L.P., 2022. "The drivers of energy intensity changes in Chinese cities: A production-theoretical decomposition analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 307(C).
    9. Yang, Xue & Su, Bin, 2019. "Impacts of international export on global and regional carbon intensity," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 253(C), pages 1-1.
    10. Weihua Su & Yuying Wang & Dalia Streimikiene & Tomas Balezentis & Chonghui Zhang, 2020. "Carbon dioxide emission decomposition along the gradient of economic development: The case of energy sustainability in the G7 and Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(4), pages 657-669, July.
    11. Chen, Jiandong & Cheng, Shulei & Song, Malin, 2018. "Changes in energy-related carbon dioxide emissions of the agricultural sector in China from 2005 to 2013," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 748-761.
    12. Xiao, Hao & Sun, Ke-Juan & Bi, Hui-Min & Xue, Jin-Jun, 2019. "Changes in carbon intensity globally and in countries: Attribution and decomposition analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 235(C), pages 1492-1504.
    13. Zbigniew Golas, 2020. "The Driving Forces of Change in Energy-related CO2 Emissions in the Polish Iron and Steel Industry in 1990-2017," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 10(5), pages 94-102.
    14. Shigetomi, Yosuke & Matsumoto, Ken'ichi & Ogawa, Yuki & Shiraki, Hiroto & Yamamoto, Yuki & Ochi, Yuki & Ehara, Tomoki, 2018. "Driving forces underlying sub-national carbon dioxide emissions within the household sector and implications for the Paris Agreement targets in Japan," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 228(C), pages 2321-2332.
    15. Tian, Yihui & Zhu, Qinghua & Geng, Yong, 2013. "An analysis of energy-related greenhouse gas emissions in the Chinese iron and steel industry," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 352-361.
    16. Mohd Irfan & Bamadev Mahapatra & Muhammad Shahbaz, 2024. "Energy efficiency in the Indian transportation sector: effect on carbon emissions," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(3), pages 6653-6676, March.
    17. Liu, Xiao & Hang, Ye & Wang, Qunwei & Chiu, Ching-Ren & Zhou, Dequn, 2022. "The role of energy consumption in global carbon intensity change: A meta-frontier-based production-theoretical decomposition analysis," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    18. Manisha Jain, 2022. "Energy efficiency targets and tracking savings: Measurement issues in developing economies," Indira Gandhi Institute of Development Research, Mumbai Working Papers 2022-015, Indira Gandhi Institute of Development Research, Mumbai, India.
    19. Baran Doda, 2018. "Tales From The Tails: Sector-Level Carbon Intensity Distribution," Climate Change Economics (CCE), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 9(04), pages 1-27, November.
    20. Jan Streeck & Johan Andrés Veléz-Henao & Jarmo S. Kikstra & Shonali Pachauri & Jihoon Min & Fridolin Krausmann & Helmut Haberl & Stefan Pauliuk & Tommaso Zaini & Dominik Wiedenhofer, 2025. "Small increases in material stocks to achieve decent living standards globally," Nature Sustainability, Nature, vol. 8(12), pages 1567-1581, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:150:y:2025:i:c:s0140988325006991. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eneco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.