IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/eneeco/v150y2025ics0140988325006437.html

From cooperative play to multi-critical decision: The Shapley Index and the Choquet Integral in comparison

Author

Listed:
  • Ventura, Francesco
  • James, J.R.
  • Caristi, Giuseppe
  • Barilla, David
  • Barba, Daniela

Abstract

This study explores the integration of Shapley’s Index and Choquet’s Integral as a hybrid approach to improve the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). While AHP provides a structured methodology for multi-criteria decision-making, it suffers from limitations related to subjectivity in the determination of weights. The Shapley Index, derived from game theory, introduces a rigorous analysis of the marginal contributions of criteria, while the Choquet Integral considers non-additive interactions between criteria. By combining these methodologies, the proposed model allows for the representation of synergies and trade-offs between criteria, improving the reliability and accuracy of decision-making. Applying the model to a case study, the article compares the results obtained with the two approaches, highlighting the contexts in which each method excels. This analysis provides a basis for future applications in critical areas such as strategic planning, risk management and energy sustainability.

Suggested Citation

  • Ventura, Francesco & James, J.R. & Caristi, Giuseppe & Barilla, David & Barba, Daniela, 2025. "From cooperative play to multi-critical decision: The Shapley Index and the Choquet Integral in comparison," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:150:y:2025:i:c:s0140988325006437
    DOI: 10.1016/j.eneco.2025.108816
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140988325006437
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.eneco.2025.108816?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wenkun Zhou & Yitao Gu, 2025. "Green Supplier Evaluation and Selection Based on Bi-Directional Shapley Choquet Integral in Interval Intuitive Fuzzy Environment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-32, April.
    2. Marzi, Sepehr & Farnia, Luca & Dasgupta, Shouro & Mysiak, Jaroslav & Lorenzoni, Arturo, 2019. "Competence analysis for promoting energy efficiency projects in developing countries: The case of OPEC," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    3. Ernest H. Forman & Saul I. Gass, 2001. "The Analytic Hierarchy Process---An Exposition," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 49(4), pages 469-486, August.
    4. Raghunathan Krishankumar & Arunodaya Raj Mishra & Pratibha Rani & Fausto Cavallaro & Kattur Soundarapandian Ravichandran, 2023. "A Novel Integrated q-Rung Fuzzy Framework for Biomass Location Selection with No Apriori Weight Choices," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-21, February.
    5. Lingjie Sun & Yingyi Liu & Boyang Zhang & Yuwei Shang & Haiwen Yuan & Zhao Ma, 2016. "An Integrated Decision-Making Model for Transformer Condition Assessment Using Game Theory and Modified Evidence Combination Extended by D Numbers," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-22, August.
    6. Huchang Liao & Shanshan Yang & Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas & Marinko Škare, 2023. "An overview of fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making methods in hospitality and tourism industries: bibliometrics, methodologies, applications and future directions," Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(3), pages 2150871-215, December.
    7. Pereira, André Alves & Pereira, Miguel Alves, 2023. "Energy storage strategy analysis based on the Choquet multi-criteria preference aggregation model: The Portuguese case," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    8. Francesco Tajani & Maria Rosaria Guarini & Francesco Sica & Rossana Ranieri & Debora Anelli, 2022. "Multi-Criteria Analysis and Sustainable Accounting. Defining Indices of Sustainability under Choquet’s Integral," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-15, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Thomas L. Saaty, 2013. "The Modern Science of Multicriteria Decision Making and Its Practical Applications: The AHP/ANP Approach," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 61(5), pages 1101-1118, October.
    2. Sandra E. Strasser & Ceyhun Ozgur & David L. Schroeder, 2002. "Selecting a Business College Major: An Analysis of Criteria and Choice Using the Analytical Hierarchy Process," American Journal of Business, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 17(2), pages 47-56.
    3. Wenshuai Wu & Gang Kou, 2016. "A group consensus model for evaluating real estate investment alternatives," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 2(1), pages 1-10, December.
    4. Nakamoto, Yuya & Eguchi, Shogo & Takayabu, Hirotaka, 2024. "Efficiency and benchmarks for photovoltaic power generation amid uncertain conditions," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    5. Issouf Fofana & Yazid Hadjadj, 2018. "Power Transformer Diagnostics, Monitoring and Design Features," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-5, November.
    6. Pei Li, 2016. "The New Product Online Evaluation by Expert Based on the Analytic Hierarchy Process Method," Asian Social Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 12(8), pages 265-265, August.
    7. Khameis Al Abdouli & Khalid Hussein & Dawit Ghebreyesus & Hatim O. Sharif, 2019. "Coastal Runoff in the United Arab Emirates—The Hazard and Opportunity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-19, September.
    8. Dianfa Wu & Zhiping Yang & Ningling Wang & Chengzhou Li & Yongping Yang, 2018. "An Integrated Multi-Criteria Decision Making Model and AHP Weighting Uncertainty Analysis for Sustainability Assessment of Coal-Fired Power Units," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-27, May.
    9. Dunbar, Kwamie & Treku, Daniel N., 2025. "Do energy transition investment flows aid climate commitments?," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 142(C).
    10. Islam, Muhammad Tanveer ul & Harillo, Alex & Pereira, Miguel Alves, 2025. "Prioritising municipal photovoltaic initiatives using multi-criteria decision analysis," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    11. Noviana, Rosita & Fathin, Safira & Pratiwi, Chairani Putri & Leonita, Lily, 2025. "Strategic Analysis for Sustainable Chrysanthemum Production: A Case Study in Cianjur Regency, West Java," 2nd ASEAN University Symposium for Sustainable Food Systems, IPB Bogor University of Agriculture, Indonesia, May 5-6, 2025 373405, Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN).
    12. Koray Altintas & Ozalp Vayvay & Sinan Apak & Emine Cobanoglu, 2020. "An Extended GRA Method Integrated with Fuzzy AHP to Construct a Multidimensional Index for Ranking Overall Energy Sustainability Performances," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-21, February.
    13. Shengyuan Liu & Fangbin Ye & Zhenzhi Lin & Jia Yang & Haigang Liu & Yinghe Lin & Haiwei Xie, 2019. "Comprehensive Quality Assessment Algorithm for Smart Meters," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-20, September.
    14. Mansour Momeni & Behnaz Samimi & Mohammad Ali Afshari & Mohammad Hasan Maleki & Javad Mohammadi, 2011. "Selection Process of Supervisor for Doctoral Dissertation Using Analytical Network Process (ANP): An Iranian Study," Journal of Management and Strategy, Journal of Management and Strategy, Sciedu Press, vol. 2(2), pages 63-71, June.
    15. Xianhui Mao & Ankui Hu & Rui Zhao & Fei Wang & Mengkun Wu, 2023. "Evaluation and Application of Surrounding Rock Stability Based on an Improved Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation Method," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(14), pages 1-19, July.
    16. Zsuzsanna Katalin Szabo & Zsombor Szádoczki & Sándor Bozóki & Gabriela C. Stănciulescu & Dalma Szabo, 2021. "An Analytic Hierarchy Process Approach for Prioritisation of Strategic Objectives of Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-26, February.
    17. Xue Ding & Mengling Qin & Linsen Yin & Dayong Lv & Yao Bai, 2023. "Research on FinTech Talent Evaluation Index System and Recruitment Strategy: Evidence From Shanghai in China," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(4), pages 21582440231, November.
    18. Jifei Zhang & Shuai Zhang, 2022. "Assessing Integrated Effectiveness of Rural Socio-Economic Development and Environmental Protection of Wenchuan County in Southwestern China: An Approach Using Game Theory and VIKOR," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-17, October.
    19. Fatima Lambarraa-Lehnhardt & Rico Ihle & Hajar Elyoubi, 2021. "How Successful Is Origin Labeling in a Developing Country Context? Moroccan Consumers’ Preferences toward Local Products," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-17, July.
    20. Moreno-Miranda, Carlos & Dries, Liesbeth, 2022. "Integrating coordination mechanisms in the sustainability assessment of agri-food chains: From a structured literature review to a comprehensive framework," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:150:y:2025:i:c:s0140988325006437. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eneco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.