IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/eneeco/v149y2025ics0140988325006164.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does China's carbon emission trading scheme policy exacerbate financing costs for enterprises?

Author

Listed:
  • Yunning, Ma
  • Wang, Shuo
  • Zhang, Ning
  • Choi, Yongrok

Abstract

China's carbon emissions trading scheme (ETS) is considered a market-oriented initiative to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and cope with climate change. Nevertheless, this initiative has intensified the financial burden on enterprises and resulted in antipathy from the participating companies. Is this troublesome in terms of companies' financial costs? To answer this question, this study investigates the influence of China's regional and national ETS policy on the financing costs of listed enterprises using the difference-in-differences approach. We discovered that China's ETS increased enterprises' financing costs by approximately 15 %. Further analysis of the mechanism of the process indicates that this occurred because the ETS policy contributed to heightened environmental protection expenditures and increased carbon market risk faced by enterprises. Moreover, we find that the greater the market risk, the higher the financing costs faced by enterprises. Our study reveals the underlying reasons that explain why creditors require increased debt financing costs for enterprises participating in the carbon market. To resolve this green financing paradox, a public-private partnership is proposed in detail.

Suggested Citation

  • Yunning, Ma & Wang, Shuo & Zhang, Ning & Choi, Yongrok, 2025. "Does China's carbon emission trading scheme policy exacerbate financing costs for enterprises?," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:149:y:2025:i:c:s0140988325006164
    DOI: 10.1016/j.eneco.2025.108789
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140988325006164
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.eneco.2025.108789?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:149:y:2025:i:c:s0140988325006164. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eneco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.