IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/eneeco/v149y2025ics0140988325005481.html

Contingency in nuclear power plant decommissioning cost estimation

Author

Listed:
  • Rothwell, Geoffrey

Abstract

Hundreds of estimates have been made of decommissioning costs for commercial nuclear power plants. There is no standard method for making these estimates, particularly for estimating contingency, a type of risk premium, to cover unexpected costs during project execution. Following cost engineering guidelines for estimating contingency requires, among other project characteristics, consideration of (1) the cost estimate's probability distribution, (2) the cost estimate's variance, (3) the estimator's assumed accuracy range that will contain the final cost, (4) the estimator's level of confidence that the final cost will be in the stated accuracy range, and (5) the cost estimate user's risk aversion. The variance (or standard deviation) can be calculated using Monte Carlo techniques, which generally assume no correlation between individual activity costs. Because of portfolio effects, the simulated standard deviation of the aggregated activity cost is smaller than what would be suggested by nuclear decommissioning cost estimating guidelines. The simulated standard deviation is more reasonable when correlations are assumed to be non-zero between activities. This conclusion is shown by applying the proposed method for estimating contingency to activity costs estimated by the decommissioning operations contractor EnergySolutions to decommission the Kewaunee nuclear power plant in Wisconsin, while it is decommissioning four other US nuclear power units after it completed the decontamination and demolition of four units, including Zion 1&2. EnergySolutions could be approaching Nth-of-a-Kind decommissioning costs for US nuclear power plants, thus cost uncertainty should decrease.

Suggested Citation

  • Rothwell, Geoffrey, 2025. "Contingency in nuclear power plant decommissioning cost estimation," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:149:y:2025:i:c:s0140988325005481
    DOI: 10.1016/j.eneco.2025.108721
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140988325005481
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.eneco.2025.108721?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rothwell, Geoffrey, 2021. "Spent nuclear fuel storage: What are the relationships between size and cost of the alternatives?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    2. repec:aen:journl:1991si-a12 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Bärenbold, Rebekka & Bah, Muhammad Maladoh & Lordan-Perret, Rebecca & Steigerwald, Björn & von Hirschhausen, Christian & Wealer, Ben & Weigt, Hannes & Wimmers, Alexander, 2024. "Decommissioning of commercial nuclear power plants: Insights from a multiple-case study," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 201(C).
    4. Peter M. Strauss & James Kelsey, 1991. "State Regulation Of Decommissioning Costs," The Energy Journal, , vol. 12(1_suppl), pages 55-72, June.
    5. Kwangheon Park & Seunghyun Son & Jinhyuk Oh & Sunkuk Kim, 2022. "Sustainable Decommissioning Strategies for Nuclear Power Plants: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-21, May.
    6. Diletta Colette Invernizzi & Giorgio Locatelli & Naomi J. Brookes, 2020. "Characterising nuclear decommissioning projects: an investigation of the project characteristics that affect the project performance," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(10), pages 947-963, October.
    7. Wimmers, Alexander & von Hirschhausen, Christian, 2024. "Organizational models for the decommissioning of nuclear power plants: Lessons from the United Kingdom and the United States," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    8. repec:aen:journl:1991si-a24 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Lordan-Perret, Rebecca & Sloan, Robert D. & Rosner, Robert, 2021. "Decommissioning the U.S. nuclear fleet: Financial assurance, corporate structures, and bankruptcy," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    10. repec:aen:journl:1991si-a05 is not listed on IDEAS
    11. Bah, Muhammad Maladoh, 2023. "Nuclear Decommissioning Profile USA," Working papers 2023/02, Faculty of Business and Economics - University of Basel.
    12. Geoffrey S. Rothwell, 1991. "The Optimal Time To Decommission Commercial Nuclear Reactors," The Energy Journal, , vol. 12(1_suppl), pages 305-314, June.
    13. Thomas LaGuardia, 1991. "A Private Contractor’S Approach To Decommissioning Costs," The Energy Journal, , vol. 12(1_suppl), pages 157-171, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wimmers, Alexander & von Hirschhausen, Christian, 2024. "Organizational models for the decommissioning of nuclear power plants: Lessons from the United Kingdom and the United States," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    2. Hanna Hrinchenko & Olha Prokopenko & Aziza Karbekova & Nataliia Antonenko & Nataliia Kovshun & Tetiana Kubakh & Serhii Poliushkin, 2025. "Sustainable Lifespan Re-Extension Management of Energy Facilities: Economic Assessment and Decision-Making Model for Phased Decommissioning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-23, May.
    3. Lee, Juyong & Cho, Youngsang, 2023. "Economic value of the development of nuclear power plant decommissioning technology in South Korea," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 181(C).
    4. Bärenbold, Rebekka & Bah, Muhammad Maladoh & Lordan-Perret, Rebecca & Steigerwald, Björn & von Hirschhausen, Christian & Wealer, Ben & Weigt, Hannes & Wimmers, Alexander, 2023. "Cross-Country Survey on the Decommissioning of Commercial Nuclear Reactors: Status, Insights and Knowledge Gaps," Working papers 2023/04, Faculty of Business and Economics - University of Basel.
    5. Rothwell, Geoffrey, 2022. "Projected electricity costs in international nuclear power markets," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
    6. Alexander Wimmers & Christian von Hirschhausen & Fabian Präger & Claudia Kemfert & Josephine Hiepler & Claudia Humann & Pauline Kaiser & Andrea Lagoda & Theresa Lang & Leila Lubosch & Ruta Nonnenbroic, 2025. "Entsorgung radioaktiver Abfälle in Deutschland – Eine Einführung in die rechtlichen und technischen Hintergründe sowie Bestandsanalyse," Data Documentation 110, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
    7. Alexander Wimmers & Fanny Bose & Leonard Goke, 2024. "Can They Compete? Cost Competitiveness of Non-Light-Water Reactors for Heat and Power Supply in a Decarbonized European Energy System," Papers 2412.15083, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2025.
    8. Kwangheon Park & Seunghyun Son & Jinhyuk Oh & Sunkuk Kim, 2022. "Sustainable Decommissioning Strategies for Nuclear Power Plants: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-21, May.
    9. Lordan-Perret, Rebecca & Bärenbold, Rebekka & Weigt, Hannes & Rosner, Robert, 2023. "An ex-ante method to verify commercial U.S. nuclear power plant decommissioning cost estimates," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 127(PB).
    10. Invernizzi, Diletta Colette & Locatelli, Giorgio & Brookes, Naomi & Davis, Allison, 2020. "Qualitative comparative analysis as a method for project studies: The case of energy infrastructure," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    11. Zhiwu Zhou & Julián Alcalá & Víctor Yepes, 2021. "Optimized Application of Sustainable Development Strategy in International Engineering Project Management," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(14), pages 1-29, July.
    12. Hui, Jiuwu, 2024. "Fixed-time fractional-order sliding mode controller with disturbance observer for U-tube steam generator," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
    13. Davies Wambwa & Jhonnah Mundike & Brian Chirambo, 2025. "Balancing economic development, social responsibility, and environmental conservation through financial assurance programs in sub-Saharan Africa’s mining industry," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 27(3), pages 5869-5892, March.
    14. James DiLellio & George Aggidis & David Vandercruyssen & David Howard, 2025. "Economic Methods for the Selection of Renewable Energy Sources: A Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-23, May.
    15. Mackie, Colin & Velenturf, Anne P.M., 2021. "Trouble on the horizon: Securing the decommissioning of offshore renewable energy installations in UK waters," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    16. Bah, Muhammad Maladoh, 2023. "State and federal nuclear support schemes in dynamic electricity market conditions: Insights from NYISO and PJM," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    17. Mahdi Awawda & Alexander Wimmers, 2024. "Delays and Deferrals in Nuclear Waste Disposal: A Stochastic Analysis of Funding Shortfalls of Germany's Waste Fund KENFO," Papers 2412.16126, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2025.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • C63 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Mathematical Methods; Programming Models; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling - - - Computational Techniques
    • D81 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Criteria for Decision-Making under Risk and Uncertainty
    • L74 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Primary Products and Construction - - - Construction
    • L94 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Transportation and Utilities - - - Electric Utilities
    • O38 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Government Policy
    • Q42 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Energy - - - Alternative Energy Sources

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:149:y:2025:i:c:s0140988325005481. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eneco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.