IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/eneeco/v148y2025ics014098832500492x.html

A strategic trading model under rate-based emissions trading schemes: Market power, driving factors, and a comparison with mass-based schemes

Author

Listed:
  • Geng, Wenxin
  • Fan, Ying
  • Li, Haoran
  • Yao, Xing

Abstract

Some evidence has shown the presence of strategic permit trading, which can reduce the cost-effectiveness of emissions trading schemes (ETSs). In contrast to most strategic trading models that focus on mass-based schemes and assume the existence of price-taking firms, in this study, we develop a two-stage model under a rate-based scheme where all firms are allowed to trade permits strategically by employing the supply function approach. We identify a unique refined equilibrium in permit trading and examine firms’ strategic behavior and the factors influencing market power. We find that both a flatter marginal production cost curve and a larger gap between firms’ emission intensities and the emission benchmark tend to strengthen market power. A similar impact is observed for permit sellers when marginal abatement costs are flatter, whereas the effect for buyers depends on a trade-off between the impact on permit purchases and the slope of the residual permit supply curve. We also conduct numerical simulations of China’s nationwide ETS. The results reveal that the effect of market power on production differs significantly between rate- and mass-based schemes. Additionally, rate-based schemes strengthen sellers’ market power relative to mass-based schemes. Finally, policy implications are proposed to prevent market power.

Suggested Citation

  • Geng, Wenxin & Fan, Ying & Li, Haoran & Yao, Xing, 2025. "A strategic trading model under rate-based emissions trading schemes: Market power, driving factors, and a comparison with mass-based schemes," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:148:y:2025:i:c:s014098832500492x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.eneco.2025.108665
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S014098832500492X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.eneco.2025.108665?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. David Malueg & Andrew Yates, 2009. "Bilateral Oligopoly, Private Information, and Pollution Permit Markets," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 43(4), pages 553-572, August.
    2. Zhou, P. & Wang, M., 2016. "Carbon dioxide emissions allocation: A review," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 47-59.
    3. Wirl, Franz, 2009. "Oligopoly meets oligopsony: The case of permits," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 58(3), pages 329-337, November.
    4. Fischer, Carolyn & Mao, Biao & Shawhan, Daniel, 2018. "Trade between mass- and rate-based regulatory regimes: Bad for emissions?," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 326-336.
    5. Dickson, Alex & MacKenzie, Ian A., 2018. "Strategic trade in pollution permits," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 94-113.
    6. Chen, Yihsu & Tanaka, Makoto, 2018. "Permit banking in emission trading: Competition, arbitrage and linkage," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 70-82.
    7. Tang, Maogang & Li, Zhen & Hu, Fengxia & Wu, Baijun & Zhang, Ruihan, 2021. "Market failure, tradable discharge permit, and pollution reduction: Evidence from industrial firms in China," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    8. repec:aen:journl:ej39-6-chen is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Li, Yuan & Zhu, Lei, 2014. "Cost of energy saving and CO2 emissions reduction in China’s iron and steel sector," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 603-616.
    10. Meunier, Guy & Montero, Juan-Pablo & Ponssard, Jean-Pierre, 2018. "Output-based allocations in pollution markets with uncertainty and self-selection," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 832-851.
    11. Mei Wang & Peng Zhou, 2020. "Impact of Permit Allocation on Cap-and-trade System Performance under Market Power," The Energy Journal, , vol. 41(6), pages 215-232, November.
    12. repec:aen:journl:ej41-6-zhou is not listed on IDEAS
    13. Juan-Pablo Montero, 2009. "Market Power in Pollution Permit Markets," Working Papers 0906, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Center for Energy and Environmental Policy Research.
    14. Godal, Odd, 2005. "Strategic markets in property rights without price-takers," Working Papers in Economics 05/05, University of Bergen, Department of Economics.
    15. Wang, Xu & Zhu, Lei & Liu, Pengfei, 2021. "Manipulation via endowments: Quantifying the influence of market power on the emission trading scheme," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    16. Tanaka, Makoto & Chen, Yihsu, 2012. "Market power in emissions trading: Strategically manipulating permit price through fringe firms," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 203-211.
    17. Juan-Pablo Montero, 2009. "Market Power in Pollution Permit Markets," The Energy Journal, , vol. 30(2_suppl), pages 115-142, December.
    18. repec:dau:papers:123456789/10174 is not listed on IDEAS
    19. repec:aen:journl:2009se-climate-change-a06 is not listed on IDEAS
    20. Andreas Lange, 2012. "On the Endogeneity of Market Power in Emissions Markets," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 52(4), pages 573-583, August.
    21. Alex Dickson & Ian A. MacKenzie, 2022. "Permit Markets with Political and Market Distortions," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 82(1), pages 227-255, May.
    22. Haita, Corina, 2014. "Endogenous market power in an emissions trading scheme with auctioning," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 253-278.
    23. Tanaka, Kenta & Matsukawa, Isamu & Managi, Shunsuke, 2020. "An experimental investigation of bilateral oligopoly in emissions trading markets," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    24. Panagiotis Koromilas & Angeliki Mathioudaki & Sotirios Dimos & Dimitris Fotakis, 2023. "Modeling Intertemporal Trading of Emission Permits Under Market Power," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 84(1), pages 241-278, January.
    25. Yihsu Chen & Makoto Tanaka & Afzal S. Siddiqui, 2018. "Market Power with Tradable Performance-Based CO2 Emission Standards in the Electricity Sector," The Energy Journal, , vol. 39(6), pages 121-146, November.
    26. Zhu, Lei & Zhang, Xiao-Bing & Li, Yuan & Wang, Xu & Guo, Jianxin, 2017. "Can an emission trading scheme promote the withdrawal of outdated capacity in energy-intensive sectors? A case study on China's iron and steel industry," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 332-347.
    27. Weretka, Marek, 2011. "Endogenous market power," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 146(6), pages 2281-2306.
    28. Chen, Hao & Kang, Jia-Ning & Liao, Hua & Tang, Bao-Jun & Wei, Yi-Ming, 2017. "Costs and potentials of energy conservation in China's coal-fired power industry: A bottom-up approach considering price uncertainties," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 23-32.
    29. Geng, Wenxin & Fan, Ying, 2022. "An imperfectly competitive permit market under a rate-based scheme," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 105(C).
    30. Robert W. Hahn, 1984. "Market Power and Transferable Property Rights," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 99(4), pages 753-765.
    31. Beat Hintermann, 2017. "Market Power in Emission Permit Markets: Theory and Evidence from the EU ETS," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 66(1), pages 89-112, January.
    32. Cao, Jing & Ho, Mun S. & Ma, Rong & Teng, Fei, 2021. "When carbon emission trading meets a regulated industry: Evidence from the electricity sector of China," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Geng, Wenxin & Fan, Ying, 2024. "The effect of market power on the inter-temporal allocation of abatement under a rate-based emissions trading scheme," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).
    2. Geng, Wenxin & Fan, Ying, 2022. "An imperfectly competitive permit market under a rate-based scheme," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 105(C).
    3. Bingxin Zeng & Lei Zhu, 2019. "Market Power and Technology Diffusion in an Energy-Intensive Sector Covered by an Emissions Trading Scheme," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(14), pages 1-18, July.
    4. Wang, Xu & Zhu, Lei & Liu, Pengfei, 2021. "Manipulation via endowments: Quantifying the influence of market power on the emission trading scheme," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    5. Alex Dickson & Ian A. MacKenzie, 2022. "Permit Markets with Political and Market Distortions," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 82(1), pages 227-255, May.
    6. Dickson, Alex & MacKenzie, Ian A., 2018. "Strategic trade in pollution permits," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 94-113.
    7. Tanaka, Kenta & Matsukawa, Isamu & Managi, Shunsuke, 2020. "An experimental investigation of bilateral oligopoly in emissions trading markets," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    8. Haita, Corina, 2014. "Endogenous market power in an emissions trading scheme with auctioning," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 253-278.
    9. Ludovic A. Julien & Anicet Kabre & Louis de Mesnard, 2023. "Pollution in strategic multilateral exchange: taxing emissions or trading on permit markets?," Working Papers hal-04159849, HAL.
    10. Wang, Xu & Zhang, Xiao-Bing & Zhu, Lei, 2019. "Imperfect market, emissions trading scheme, and technology adoption: A case study of an energy-intensive sector," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 142-158.
    11. Panagiotis Koromilas & Angeliki Mathioudaki & Sotirios Dimos & Dimitris Fotakis, 2023. "Modeling Intertemporal Trading of Emission Permits Under Market Power," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 84(1), pages 241-278, January.
    12. Dijkstra, Bouwe R. & Nentjes, Andries, 2020. "Pareto-Efficient Solutions for Shared Public Good Provision: Nash Bargaining versus Exchange-Matching-Lindahl," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 61(C).
    13. Yates, Andrew J. & Doyle, Martin W. & Rigby, J.R. & Schnier, Kurt E., 2013. "Market power, private information, and the optimal scale of pollution permit markets with application to North Carolina's Neuse River," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 35(3), pages 256-276.
    14. Corina Haita-Falah, 2016. "Uncertainty and speculators in an auction for emissions permits," Journal of Regulatory Economics, Springer, vol. 49(3), pages 315-343, June.
    15. Kurt Schnier & Martin Doyle & James R. Rigby & Andrew J. Yates, 2014. "Bilateral Oligopoly In Pollution Permit Markets: Experimental Evidence," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 52(3), pages 1060-1079, July.
    16. Bingxin Zeng & Jun Xie & Xiaobing Zhang & Yang Yu & Lei Zhu, 2020. "The impacts of emission trading scheme on China’s thermal power industry: A pre-evaluation from the micro level," Energy & Environment, , vol. 31(6), pages 1007-1030, September.
    17. repec:isu:genstf:202502111727480000 is not listed on IDEAS
    18. Cheng, Haitao, 2024. "Domestic versus international emissions trading with capital mobility," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    19. Francisco J. André & Luis Miguel de Castro, 2020. "Market Power in Output and Emissions Trading," Games, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-22, October.
    20. Ellen M. Bruno & Richard J. Sexton, 2020. "The Gains from Agricultural Groundwater Trade and the Potential for Market Power: Theory and Application," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 102(3), pages 884-910, May.
    21. D’Amato, Alessio & Valentini, Edilio & Zoli, Mariangela, 2017. "Tradable quota taxation and market power," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 248-252.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:148:y:2025:i:c:s014098832500492x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eneco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.