IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ejores/v336y2027i2p648-660.html

A pairwise-frontier-based classification framework for two-group classification

Author

Listed:
  • Jin, Qianying
  • Kerstens, Kristiaan
  • Van de Woestyne, Ignace
  • Zhou, Zhongbao

Abstract

Mathematical programming-based methods are widely used to generate separating boundaries in two-group classification problems. While nonlinear boundaries may often yield better performance, they typically require pre-specifying a nonlinear functional form. This contribution proposes a novel pairwise-frontier-based classification (PFC) framework that approximates nonlinear separating boundaries without the need for such a specification. The proposed PFC framework clarifies the role of axioms in classification, providing a clear basis for axiom selection based on problem characteristics. Building on this, PFC methods with nonconvex (NC) frontiers are developed, ensuring that the overlap is not artificially enlarged. To further minimize overlap, certain training observations are deliberately controlled to misclassify, provided that the total misclassification cost does not increase. This enables the extension from hard frontiers to more stable soft frontiers. The applicability of the proposed PFC methods is validated through simulation studies and real-life datasets. The results show that the proposed PFC methods are competitive with some well-established classifiers. Specifically, the PFC-NCSoft method demonstrates superior average performance and greater stability, making it particularly suitable for imbalanced classification tasks.

Suggested Citation

  • Jin, Qianying & Kerstens, Kristiaan & Van de Woestyne, Ignace & Zhou, Zhongbao, 2027. "A pairwise-frontier-based classification framework for two-group classification," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 336(2), pages 648-660.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:336:y:2027:i:2:p:648-660
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2026.05.009
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377221726004546
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ejor.2026.05.009?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:336:y:2027:i:2:p:648-660. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.