Author
Listed:
- Kumawat, Govind Lal
- Papier, Felix
- Roy, Debjit
Abstract
Motivated by the recent exits of automotive original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) from various markets, we study a stochastic capacity allocation problem in which the capacity allocation decisions of a dominant supplier influence both market demand and the exit risk of an OEM. For example, a shortage of critical components can jeopardize the OEM’s profitability, ultimately increasing its risk of market exit. We develop a stochastic capacity allocation model where the buyer (i.e., OEM) faces service-dependent demand and market exit risk. The customer demand is modeled as a function of the OEM’s market goodwill, which evolves based on the component supply from the supplier. We show that the supplier’s optimal capacity allocation policy follows a goodwill-dependent threshold policy characterized by two control limits, which depend on the OEM’s market goodwill, risk tolerance, and profit objectives. Our analysis yields several key insights. First, even when component supply is more critical for a fragile OEM, the supplier may sometimes allocate less capacity to the fragile OEM than to a non-fragile one. Second, when the OEM faces service-dependent demand, the supplier strategically allocates more capacity than in scenarios without service-dependent demand. Finally, we observe that as customers emphasize recent experiences, the optimal capacity allocation increases. This heightened sensitivity necessitates more careful handling by the OEM, prompting the supplier to ensure a more reliable supply of components. The insights from our study provide suppliers of critical components with valuable strategies for managing production for OEMs that are facing service-dependent demand.
Suggested Citation
Kumawat, Govind Lal & Papier, Felix & Roy, Debjit, 2026.
"Dynamic capacity allocation under service-dependent demand and market exit risk,"
European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 335(1), pages 152-165.
Handle:
RePEc:eee:ejores:v:335:y:2026:i:1:p:152-165
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2026.02.031
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:335:y:2026:i:1:p:152-165. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eor .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.