IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ejores/v333y2026i2p381-397.html

Ordering policies for multi-item inventory systems with correlated demands

Author

Listed:
  • Rahimi, Zhaleh
  • Down, Douglas G.
  • Li, Na
  • Arnold, Donald M.

Abstract

We investigate optimal ordering policies for a multi-item periodic-review inventory system, considering demand correlations and historical data for the products involved. We extend inventory models by transitioning from an autoregressive moving average (ARMA) demand process to a vector autoregressive moving average (VARMA) framework, explicitly characterizing optimal ordering policies when there is both autocorrelation and cross-correlation among multiple items. Through experimental studies, we evaluate inventory costs and cost improvements compared to multi-item ordering policies where demands are assumed to be independent under different degrees of correlation, noise levels, and training data window sizes. The results show that the framework effectively reduces inventory costs, particularly for products with moderate to high dependence. Cost reductions can reach up to 25% for moderate and up to 65% for strong dependence. We also apply our findings to real-world data to optimize inventory policies for immunoglobulin sub-products, intravenous (IVIg) and subcutaneous (SCIg), demonstrating cost improvements using the proposed policy. Furthermore, an empirical study analyzing a large sales dataset reinforces the applicability of our approach.

Suggested Citation

  • Rahimi, Zhaleh & Down, Douglas G. & Li, Na & Arnold, Donald M., 2026. "Ordering policies for multi-item inventory systems with correlated demands," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 333(2), pages 381-397.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:333:y:2026:i:2:p:381-397
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2025.12.042
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377221725010094
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ejor.2025.12.042?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:333:y:2026:i:2:p:381-397. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.